LEADER 03546nam  22005055  450 
001 9910349548203321
005 20200705104656.0
010   $a3-030-23014-7
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-23014-2
035   $a(CKB)4100000009076298
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5883405
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-23014-2
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000009076298
100   $a20190826d2019      u|             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aRadical Democracy and Its Limits$b[electronic resource] /$fby David Matijasevich
205   $a1st ed. 2019.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2019.
215   $a1 online resource (315 pages)
311   $a3-030-23013-9 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $a1. Radical Democracy and Its Antagonism Problem -- 2. Thought and Action: The Theoretical Bases of Radical Democratic Agonism -- 3. From Protest to War: Agonism and Antagonism in HDZ Croatia -- 4. Red vs. Yellow: Organic Crisis and the Radical Democratic Politics of Thailand -- 5. Radically Open to Radically Closed: The End of Agonism in Post-Colonial Singapore -- 6. Towards Revolution or Reform? Radical Democratic Impasse in France?s May 68 -- 7. Cross-Case Comparison: Scenarios and Circumstances of Radical Democratic Politics -- 8. Five Problems for Radical Democratic Theory -- 9. The Future of Radical Democracy.
330   $aOver the last several decades, many political theorists have touted the banner of ?radical democracy? to view the agonistic?that is, non-coercive?struggle against power as the correct way forward for progressive political actors, rather than the antagonistic acquisition or use of it. The belief that such engagements respect the political equality of all and are thus more democratic lies at the heart of this trend; and yet, recent developments have shown that events with such agonistic beginnings, such as Occupy, the Arab Spring, and Hong Kong?s Umbrella Movement have the clear potential of ending antagonistically. Comparing four historical cases of popular uprising that fluctuated between agonistic and antagonistic moments, this book establishes the circumstances under which such agonistic engagements with power can both take off and persist. Revealing the many limitations that agonistic politics is shown to face, Radical Democracy and its Limits makes a needed intervention into contemporary democratic theory and argues that radical democracy should not be held up as a model for those pursuing a more egalitarian future. .
606   $aPolitical philosophy
606   $aPolitical theory
606   $aDemocracy
606   $aPolitical Philosophy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E37000
606   $aPolitical Theory$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911010
606   $aDemocracy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911050
615  0$aPolitical philosophy.
615  0$aPolitical theory.
615  0$aDemocracy.
615 14$aPolitical Philosophy.
615 24$aPolitical Theory.
615 24$aDemocracy.
676   $a321.8
700   $aMatijasevich$b David$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0969240
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910349548203321
996   $aRadical Democracy and Its Limits$92202241
997   $aUNINA