LEADER 03707nam 22005535 450 001 9910349547803321 005 20220609105303.0 010 $a3-030-22161-X 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-22161-4 035 $a(CKB)4100000009152660 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5887768 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-22161-4 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000009152660 100 $a20190828d2019 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aSubstance in Aristotle's Metaphysics Zeta /$fby Norman O. Dahl 205 $a1st ed. 2019. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2019. 215 $a1 online resource (357 pages) 311 $a3-030-22160-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aChapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: Background Considerations -- Chapter 3: The Categories View of Basic Constituents -- Chapter 4: Two New Candidates for Basic Constituents -- Chapter 5: The Metaphysics and Metaphysics Zeta -- Chapter 6: Z.1, Substantial Forms or Individual Composites as Basic Constituents -- Chapter 7: Z.3, The Rejection of Matter -- Chapter 8: Z.4-5, Essence -- Chapter 9: Z.6 and the Pale Man Argument -- Chapter 10: Z.6 and the Argument About Platonic Forms -- Chapter 11: Z.6 and the Regress Argument -- Chapter 12: Z.7-9, The Reintroduction of Matter and Form -- Chapter 13: Z.10-11, Does Form Have Matter as Part of It? -- Chapter 14: The Universal as Substance: Z.13 1038b8-1039a3 ? Problems of Interpretation -- Chapter 15: The Universal as Substance: 1038b8-1039a3 -- Solutions to the Problems -- Chapter 16: The Universal as Substance: Z.13-16 -- An Aporia and What Follows -- Chapter 17: Z.17, A Fresh Start -- Chapter 18: Conclusion. 330 $aThis book argues that according to Metaphysics Zeta, substantial forms constitute substantial being in the sensible world, and individual composites make up the basic constituents that possess this kind of being. The study explains why Aristotle provides a reexamination of substance after the Categories, Physics, and De Anima, and highlights the contribution Z is meant to make to the science of being. Norman O. Dahl argues that Z.1-11 leaves both substantial forms and individual composites as candidates for basic constituents, with Z.12 being something that can be set aside. He explains that although the main focus of Z.13-16 is to argue against a Platonic view that takes universals to be basic constituents, some of its arguments commit Aristotle to individual composites as basic constituents, with Z.17?s taking substantial form to constitute substantial being is compatible with that commitment. . 606 $aPhilosophy, Ancient 606 $aGreek language 606 $aClassical Philosophy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E12000 606 $aGreek$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/N25000 606 $aMetafísica$2thub 606 $aSubstància (Filosofia)$2thub 606 $aFilosofia antiga$2thub 608 $aLlibres electrònics$2thub 615 0$aPhilosophy, Ancient. 615 0$aGreek language. 615 14$aClassical Philosophy. 615 24$aGreek. 615 7$aMetafísica 615 7$aSubstància (Filosofia) 615 7$aFilosofia antiga 676 $a110 676 $a160 700 $aDahl$b Norman O$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$043221 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910349547803321 996 $aSubstance in Aristotle's Metaphysics Zeta$92261644 997 $aUNINA