LEADER 04395nam  22006975  450 
001 9910349542803321
005 20211216140703.0
010   $a3-030-21898-8
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-21898-0
035   $a(CKB)4100000009375196
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-21898-0
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5906809
035   $a(PPN)258017155
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000009375196
100   $a20190926d2019      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurnn#008mamaa
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aArticulating Intersex: A Crisis at the Intersection of Scientific Facts and Social Ideals /$fby Natalie Delimata
205   $a1st ed. 2019.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2019.
215   $a1 online resource (XVI, 186 p.)
225 1 $aPhilosophy and Medicine,$x0376-7418 ;$v131
311   $a3-030-21897-X 
327   $aChapter 1 - Introduction -- Chapter 2 ? Articulating Intersex in a Binary Society -- Chapter 3 ? Epistemic Monism -- Chapter 4 ? Essentialism and Intersex -- Chapter 5 ? Naturalism and Intersex -- Chapter 6 ? Emergentism and Intersex -- Chapter 7 ? Humean Morals and Intersex -- Bibliography.
330   $aThis book explores the ethical dilemma clinicians may face when disclosing a diagnosis of atypical sex. The moment of disclosure reveals an epistemic incompatibility between scientific fact and social meaning in relation to sex. Attempting to assess the bio-psychosocial implications of this dilemma highlights a complex historic antagonism between fact and meaning making satisfactory resolution of this dilemma difficult. Drawing on David Hume, WVO Quine and Michel Foucault the author presents an integrative model, which views scientific fact and social meaning as codetermining threads in one fabric of knowledge. From this epistemic perspective, the ethical dilemma is understood as a tear in the fabric signifying a rupturing of ontological integrity. To mend this tear and resolve the ethical dilemma three metaphysical perspectives are considered: essentialism, naturalism and emergentism. The book?s unique features include: an exploration of the impact of diagnostic disclosure on people with atypical sex (intersex); a synthesis of the epistemic perspectives of social and natural science facilitating interdisciplinary collaboration; a critical evaluation of three metaphysical perspectives on atypical sex (intersex); the application of Hume?s epistemological and moral distinctions to contemporary biomedicine and bioethics. The book?s target audience includes academics, students and professionals whose work intersects the natural and social sciences, and individuals interested in the metaphysics, epistemology and meta-ethics of sex.
410  0$aPhilosophy and Medicine,$x0376-7418 ;$v131
606   $aBioethics
606   $aMedical ethics
606   $aHuman body?Social aspects
606   $aPoststructuralism
606   $aIntersex Persons$xpsychology
606   $aPhilosophy
606   $aHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
606   $aBioethics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E14010
606   $aTheory of Medicine/Bioethics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/H66000
606   $aSociology of the Body$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X22230
606   $aPoststructuralism$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E46000
615  0$aBioethics.
615  0$aMedical ethics.
615  0$aHuman body?Social aspects.
615  0$aPoststructuralism.
615 12$aIntersex Persons$xpsychology.
615 22$aPhilosophy.
615 22$aHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice.
615 14$aBioethics.
615 24$aTheory of Medicine/Bioethics.
615 24$aSociology of the Body.
615 24$aPoststructuralism.
676   $a171.7
676   $a306.7685
700   $aDelimata$b Natalie$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0865603
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910349542803321
996   $aArticulating Intersex: A Crisis at the Intersection of Scientific Facts and Social Ideals$91931841
997   $aUNINA