LEADER 04556nam  22007215  450 
001 9910349373203321
005 20200706021605.0
010   $a3-030-17119-1
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-17119-3
035   $a(CKB)4100000009040732
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5852053
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-17119-3
035   $a(PPN)258064420
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000009040732
100   $a20190816d2019      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aRegulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology $eA Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Frameworks of Selected Countries and the EU /$fedited by Hans-Georg Dederer, David Hamburger
205   $a1st ed. 2019.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2019.
215   $a1 online resource (379 pages)
311   $a3-030-17118-3 
327   $aFM -- Introduction: Regulation of plants derived from genome editing - What Lessons to be learned from other countries? -- Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology: Argentina -- Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology: Australia -- Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology: Canada -- Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology: European Union -- Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology: Japan -- Genetic Engineering in the United States: Regulation of crops and their food products -- Comparative Analysis: The Regulation of Plants Derived from Genome Editing in Argentina, Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan and the United States -- Appendix.
330   $aThis book provides in-depth insights into the regulatory frameworks of five countries and the EU concerning the regulation of genome edited plants. The country reports form the basis for a comparative analysis of the various national regulations governing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in general and genome edited plants in particular, as well as the underlying regulatory approaches. The reports, which focus on the regulatory status quo of genome edited plants in Argentina, Australia, Canada, the EU, Japan and the USA, were written by distinguished experts following a uniform structure. On this basis, the legal frameworks are compared in order to foster a rational assessment of which approaches could be drawn upon to adjust, or to completely realign, the current EU regime for GMOs. In addition, a separate chapter identifies potential best practices for the regulation of plants derived from genome editing.
606   $aPrivate international law
606   $aConflict of laws
606   $aPlant breeding
606   $aEnvironmental engineering
606   $aBiotechnology
606   $aGenetic engineering
606   $aLaw?Europe
606   $aFood?Biotechnology
606   $aPrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law $3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R14002
606   $aPlant Breeding/Biotechnology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/L24060
606   $aEnvironmental Engineering/Biotechnology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/U33000
606   $aGenetic Engineering$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/C12037
606   $aEuropean Law$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R20000
606   $aFood Science$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/C15001
615  0$aPrivate international law.
615  0$aConflict of laws.
615  0$aPlant breeding.
615  0$aEnvironmental engineering.
615  0$aBiotechnology.
615  0$aGenetic engineering.
615  0$aLaw?Europe.
615  0$aFood?Biotechnology.
615 14$aPrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law .
615 24$aPlant Breeding/Biotechnology.
615 24$aEnvironmental Engineering/Biotechnology.
615 24$aGenetic Engineering.
615 24$aEuropean Law.
615 24$aFood Science.
676   $a630
676   $a660.6
702   $aDederer$b Hans-Georg$4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
702   $aHamburger$b David$4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910349373203321
996   $aRegulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology$91754604
997   $aUNINA