LEADER 01417oam 2200397 450 001 9910717435503321 005 20220325084830.0 035 $a(CKB)4330000001272268 035 $a(OCoLC)1305500956 035 $a(EXLCZ)994330000001272268 100 $a20220325d2012 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aPrioritizing pesticide compounds for analytical methods development /$fby Julia E. Norman, Julia E. Kuivila, and Lisa M. Nowell 210 1$aReston, Virginia :$cU.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey,$d2012. 215 $a1 online resource (xi, 206 pages) $ccolor illustrations +$eappendix 225 1 $aScientific investigations report ;$v2012-5045 300 $a"National Water-Quality Assessment Program." 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 606 $aPesticides$xAnalysis 615 0$aPesticides$xAnalysis. 700 $aNorman$b Julia E.$01388140 702 $aKuivila$b Julia E. 702 $aNowell$b Lisa H. 712 02$aNational Water-Quality Assessment Program (U.S.) 712 02$aGeological Survey (U.S.), 801 0$bGPO 801 1$bGPO 801 2$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910717435503321 996 $aPrioritizing pesticide compounds for analytical methods development$93438567 997 $aUNINA LEADER 01516nam2 22003373i 450 001 VEA0010525 005 20231121125918.0 100 $a19961012d1991 ||||0itac50 ba 101 | $alat 102 $ait 181 1$6z01$ai $bxxxe 182 1$6z01$an 200 1 $aM. Tulli Ciceronis orationes spuriae 461 1$1001RAV0079387$12001 $aM. Tulli Ciceronis Opera omnia quae exstant critico apparatu instructa$fconsilio et auctoritate Collegi Ciceronianis studiis provehendis 463 1$1001VEA0010528$12001 $a˜1: œOratio pridie quam in exilium iret$aQuinta Catilinaria$aResponsio Catiline$fMaria De Marco recognovit$v1 700 1$aCicero$b, Marcus Tullius$3CFIV006643$4070$082411 790 1$aCicerone$b, Marco Tullio$3CFIV006644$zCicero, Marcus Tullius 790 0$aCicerone$3CFIV030674$zCicero, Marcus Tullius 790 0$aCicéron$3CFIV068480$zCicero, Marcus Tullius 790 1$aCicerone$b, M. Tullio$3CFIV150753$zCicero, Marcus Tullius 790 0$aCyceron$3CFIV254495$zCicero, Marcus Tullius 801 3$aIT$bIT-01$c19961012 850 $aIT-RM028 $aIT-FR0017 899 $aBiblioteca Universitaria Alessandrina$bRM028 899 $aBiblioteca umanistica Giorgio Aprea$bFR0017 912 $aVEA0010525 950 2$aBiblioteca umanistica Giorgio Aprea$d 52S.SIJ. LL1 Cic.Opera.15 (CC)$d 52S.SIJ. LL1 Cic.Opera.15 (CC)* 967 $m1 977 $a 01$a 52 996 $aM. Tulli Ciceronis orationes spuriae$93643071 997 $aUNICAS LEADER 03502nam 2200481z- 450 001 9910346742803321 005 20210212 035 $a(CKB)4920000000094286 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/57335 035 $a(oapen)doab57335 035 $a(EXLCZ)994920000000094286 100 $a20202102d2018 |y 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aPsychosocial Job Dimensions and Distress/Well-Being: Issues and Challenges in Occupational Health Psychology 210 $cFrontiers Media SA$d2018 215 $a1 online resource (261 p.) 225 1 $aFrontiers Research Topics 311 08$a2-88945-408-8 330 $aOver the last three decades a large body of research has showed that psychosocial job dimensions such as time pressure, decision authority and social support, could have significant implications for psychological distress and well-being. Theoretical models, such as the job demand-control-social support model (JDCS model), the effort-reward imbalance model (ERI model), the job demands-resources model (JDR model) and the vitamin model suggest that distress and positive dimensions at work (well being and motivation) can be considered as two sides of the same coin. If the job is designed to provide the right mix of psychosocial job dimensions (e.g., optimal time pressure, decision authority and social support), work can boost job engagement and well-being as well as productive behaviors at work. When the job is not designed in an optimal way (e.g., too much time pressure and too little decision authority) work can trigger stress reactions and burnout. Although some insight has been gained on how job dimensions could predict distress and well-being, and also into the dimensions that might moderate and mediate these associations; research still faces several challenges. Firstly, most of this research has been cross-sectional in nature, thus making it difficult to conclude on the long-term effects of psychosocial job dimensions. Another challenge concerns how the contextual dimensions can be incorporated into micro-levels models on employee stress and well-being. Nowadays, work is carried out in the context of a wider environment that includes organizational variables. So far the role of the organizational variables in the theoretical frameworks for explaining the relationships between psychosocial job dimensions, employee distress and well-being, has often been underplayed. The main aim of this research topic is to bring together international research from different theoretical and methodological perspectives in order to advance knowledge and practice in the field of work stress. 517 $aPsychosocial Job Dimensions and Distress/Well-Being 606 $aPsychology$2bicssc 610 $aBurnout 610 $aEngagement 610 $aIllegitimate tasks 610 $aIndividual differences 610 $aJob resources 610 $aJob satisfaction 610 $aJob strain 610 $aOccupational stress 610 $aPsychosocial job dimensions 610 $aRecovery dimensions 615 7$aPsychology 700 $aAnthony J. Montgomery$4auth$01331080 702 $aRenato Pisanti$4auth 702 $aJames Campbell Quick$4auth 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910346742803321 996 $aPsychosocial Job Dimensions and Distress$93040108 997 $aUNINA