LEADER 03758nam 2200481z- 450 001 9910346013203321 005 20210211 010 $a989-26-1671-5 035 $a(CKB)4920000000093885 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/43212 035 $a(oapen)doab43212 035 $a(EXLCZ)994920000000093885 100 $a20202102d2018 |y 0 101 0 $apor 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aCi?cero: Obra e Recepc?a?o 210 $cCoimbra University Press$d2018 215 $a1 online resource (236 p.) 225 1 $aClassica Digitalia: Humanitas Supplementum - Estudos Monográficos 311 08$a989-26-1670-7 327 $aA tradic?a?o manuscrita do Lucullus de Ci?cero = The manuscript tradition of Cicero's Lucullus / Ermanno Malaspina -- Ci?cero em Atenas = Cicero in Athens / Sidney Calheiros de Lima -- A primeira historiografia romana no De Oratore = The Early Roman Historiography in the De Oratore / Adriano Scatolin -- Da eloque?ncia a? filosofia = From eloquence to philosophy / Carlos Le?vy -- Ci?cero em Se?neca = Cicero in Seneca / Aldo Setaioli -- A leitura petrarquista do Pro Archi a de Ci?cero e a defesa da poesia = The Petrarchist reception of Cicero's Pro Archia and the defense of poetry / Bianca Fanelli Morganti -- Erasmo e os Ciceronianos = Erasmus and the Ciceronians / Elaine Cristine Sartorelli. 330 $aThe book brings together seven essays on Cicero written by specialists in the Author. The essays are grouped into two sections: the first one presents papers on Cicero's works (the dialogues: Lucullus, De finibus, De oratore, De officiis); the papers in the second one discuss on both the early and late reception of Cicero (in Seneca, Petrarch and Erasmus). The authors are professors from Brazilian (Adriano Scatolin, Bianca Fanelli Morganti, Elaine Cristine Sartorelli, Sidney Calheiros de Lima), French (Carlos Le?vy) and Italian universities (Aldo Setaioli, Ermanno Malaspina). The book avoids traditional biographical approach, which tends to take the works of Cicero as a reliable witness of political and family events, sometimes distrusts them as a distorted picture of public and private actors. The essays here assembled also avoid conceiving Cicero's works as either the Author's profession of faith in a philosophical doctrine, or a tendentious presentation of the theses of philosophical schools. Instead, the contributors adopt another interpretative key, so that, when analyzing a philosophical dialogue of Cicero, instead of seeking references to its historical moment, focus on its controversial aspects (due to the dispute between the schools of philosophy), rhetorical aspects (the amplifying devices through which the Author compares the strength of one thesis with the weakness of another), fictional aspects (including the description of the scene and the picture of the characters). Thus, it can be said that the book seeks a more appropriate approach to Cicero's works, not taking them as mere source of historical knowledge, but considering their historicity, that is, the devices for discursive production of their own time. 517 $aCícero 517 $aCícero 606 $aPhilosophy$2bicssc 610 $aCicero 610 $aHistoriography 610 $aPhilology 610 $aPhilosophy 610 $aReception 610 $aRhetoric 615 7$aPhilosophy 676 $a875/.01 701 2$aMalaspina$b Ermanno$01370009 702 $aCardoso$b Isabella Tardin 702 $aMartinho$b Marcos 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910346013203321 996 $aCi?cero$93397270 997 $aUNINA