LEADER 02167oam  2200517I  450 
001 9910345140303321
005 20230814231531.0
010   $a0-429-98049-3
010   $a0-429-50086-6
010   $a1-4294-8783-6
035   $a(CKB)1000000000476358
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000144868
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12054421
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000144868
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10155636
035   $a(PQKB)10291866
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5323258
035   $a(OCoLC)761105883
035   $a(FlBoTFG)9780429500862
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000476358
100   $a20181122h20182001  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||   |||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aElection Studies $eWhat's Their Use? /$fby Elihu Katz
205   $aFirst edition.
210  1$aBoca Raton, FL :$cRoutledge,$d[2018].
210  4$dİ2001.
215   $a1 online resource (285 pages) $cillustrations, tables
300   $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
311   $a0-367-09835-0 
311   $a0-8133-6635-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index.
330 3 $aAcademic studies of elections are not in the business of predicting outcomes. They are in the business of explaining them. The best studies treat voting data as raw material with which to explore socio-psychological processes such as individual decision-making and such sources of influence as issues, personality, media, socio-economic background, and party loyalty. The ebb and flow of ideologies and the comparative workings of different political systems are core topics on which election studies shed light. Looking back on more than fifty years of voting research, some of its major practitioners and critics reflect here on what has--and has not--been accomplished.
606   $aElections$xResearch
615  0$aElections$xResearch.
676   $a324.9
700   $aKatz$b Elihu$0111194
801  0$bFlBoTFG
801  1$bFlBoTFG
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910345140303321
996   $aElection Studies$92845303
997   $aUNINA