LEADER 03656 am 2200601 n 450 001 9910348242203321 005 20191130 010 $a2-36245-075-9 024 7 $a10.4000/books.ifeagd.2934 035 $a(CKB)4100000009763306 035 $a(FrMaCLE)OB-ifeagd-2934 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/61411 035 $a(PPN)241653428 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000009763306 100 $a20191106j|||||||| ||| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $auu||||||m|||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aTurkey-Iran Relations after the JDP /$fBayram Sinkaya 210 $aIstanbul $cInstitut français d?études anatoliennes$d2019 330 $aAfter the JDP came to power in Turkey in 2002, much has changed in Turkish foreign policy as well as profound changes in international, regional and domestic contexts surrounding it. Particularly fluctuations in Turkish-Iranian relations in the course of seventeen years have been very puzzling, and complicated, which made it worthy of study. Once, relations between the two states have so improved that some pundits regarded it as an evidence of shift of axis in Turkish foreign policy. Soon later, Ankara and Tehran embroiled in a regional competition that reminded the Ottoman-Safavid rivalry of the 16th century with its strategic and sectarian implications. Later on, they have developed amicable relations. Against this background one may question how could we understand that very dynamic nature of Turkish-Iranian relations? Considering this complicated and dynamic picture, we should analyse decisive factors in the relations between Ankara and Tehran. In other words, what has changed - and has been changing - in Turkish-Iranian relations after the JDP? In order to comprehend the complicated and dynamic interactions between Ankara and Tehran, this research goes beyond the JDP period in Turkey and put forwards a review of the history of Turkish-Iranian relations. And then, it focuses on the JDP period and analyse relations between Ankara and Tehran from diplomatic, economic and regional perspectives. Finally, it makes some speculations on the future of Turkish-Iranian relations. It argues that the complicated relationship between the two countries have been determined by a configuration of geopolitical context, structural factors, and the ruling elite. The JDP elite have employed rationalization, institutionalization and compartmentalization strategies to further Turkish-Iranian relations. However, they could not go beyond the diplomatic culture that set the longer history of interactions between the two countries on a fine course between bitter rivalry and friendly relations. 606 $aGeography 606 $a21e siècle 606 $arelations internationales 606 $aTurkey 606 $aIran 606 $aTurkish-Iranian relations 606 $aJDP 606 $aRecep Tayyip Erdo?an 606 $aMiddle East 610 $aMiddle East 610 $aTurkey 610 $aIran 610 $aRecep Tayyip Erdo?an 610 $aJDP 610 $aTurkish-Iranian relations 615 4$aGeography 615 4$a21e siècle 615 4$arelations internationales 615 4$aTurkey 615 4$aIran 615 4$aTurkish-Iranian relations 615 4$aJDP 615 4$aRecep Tayyip Erdo?an 615 4$aMiddle East 700 $aSinkaya$b Bayram$01366083 801 0$bFR-FrMaCLE 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910348242203321 996 $aTurkey-Iran Relations after the JDP$93388505 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02789 am 2200709 n 450 001 9910341848803321 005 20190521 010 $a2-35768-094-6 024 7 $a10.4000/books.eua.1927 035 $a(CKB)4100000009382703 035 $a(FrMaCLE)OB-eua-1927 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/57693 035 $a(PPN)240757513 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000009382703 100 $a20191001j|||||||| ||| 0 101 0 $afre 135 $auu||||||m|||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 13$aLa Réalité a perdu sa voix /$fEdward Bond 210 $aAvignon $cÉditions Universitaires d?Avignon$d2019 215 $a1 online resource (40 p.) 311 $a2-35768-001-6 330 $aJ?ai vécu en un temps où ce qu?on pouvait appeler la justice a été déchiqueté, ce qui veut dire que notre être humain, aussi, a été déchiqueté. (...) Et donc cette question de la justice nous est présentée, à nous. (...) L?art dramatique n?est aucunement un luxe, c?est le fondement même de la civilisation. Le théâtre tel que nous le connaissons fut créé par les Grecs et, sans doute, encore aujourd?hui, c?est le théâtre qui a le plus à nous dire. Les Grecs ont eu besoin de créer le théâtre parce qu?ils créaient la démocratie, la première vraie démocratie urbaine. Ils disposaient pour cela de trois institutions principales : l?Assemblée (...), le Tribunal. (...) Ces deux institutions avaient trait à la loi. La troisième était le Théâtre qui, lui, n?avait rien à voir avec la loi : le Théâtre avait à voir avec la justice, (...) la culture grecque est née de là. 606 $aTheater 606 $aradicalité 606 $apessimisme 606 $ahumanité 606 $aviolence 606 $astructure familiale 606 $avoix 606 $aart dramatique 606 $ajustice 606 $aculture grecque 610 $aculture grecque 610 $aart dramatique 610 $apessimisme 610 $astructure familiale 610 $ajustice 610 $aradicalité 610 $ahumanité 610 $aviolence 610 $avoix 615 4$aTheater 615 4$aradicalité 615 4$apessimisme 615 4$ahumanité 615 4$aviolence 615 4$astructure familiale 615 4$avoix 615 4$aart dramatique 615 4$ajustice 615 4$aculture grecque 700 $aBond$b Edward$0163765 701 $aBond$b Edward$0163765 701 $aEthis$b Emmanuel$01286053 801 0$bFR-FrMaCLE 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910341848803321 996 $aLa Réalité a perdu sa voix$93021055 997 $aUNINA