LEADER 03505nam  22005895  450 
001 9910338028403321
005 20230810164457.0
010   $a3-030-15804-7
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-15804-0
035   $a(CKB)4100000008217479
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5776098
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-15804-0
035   $a(PPN)259460680
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000008217479
100   $a20190517d2019      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 14$aThe Politics of Spectacle and Emotion in the 2016 Presidential Campaign /$fby Heather E. Yates
205   $a1st ed. 2019.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Pivot,$d2019.
215   $a1 online resource (132 pages)
225 1 $aPalgrave Studies in US Elections,$x2731-6793
311   $a3-030-15803-9 
327   $a1. Why Emotions Matter in Politics -- 2. The Year of 'Democrazy' and The Politics of Spectacle -- 3. The Politics of ?America First?: Problematizing the Economy and Trade on The Campaign Tail -- 4. The Health of a Nation: The Politics and Legacy of Health Care Reform -- 5. Neo-Nativism and Global Frienemies: Feelings Toward Immigration and National Security Issues -- 6. God, Guns, and Bathrooms: Concepts of Morality on the Campaign Trail -- 7. Conclusion: The Campaign of Personalized Conflict.
330   $aThis book examines the highly emotional context of the 2016 US presidential campaign through the scope of political theater and emotional attribution. It takes inventory of the political landscape that defined the campaign and advances the argument that the campaign?s high intensity generated a more interest-attentive citizenry and became an exercise in political theater. A framework operationalizing the components of political spectacle anchors the analysis treating emotions, affect transfer and the rise of negative partisanship. The analytical scope is focused specifically on voters? emotional responses toward Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton and empirically demonstrates the effects of discrete feelings on five emotional dimensions including pride, hope, fear, anger, and disgust on attitudes about issues ranging from the economy to immigration to the 2016 Supreme Court vacancy. Anchored in the Affective Intelligence Theory and affect transfer, the findings lend support to the principles of negative partisanship that characterized the 2016 presidential contest.
410  0$aPalgrave Studies in US Elections,$x2731-6793
606   $aAmerica$xPolitics and government
606   $aElections
606   $aPolitical sociology
606   $aCommunication in politics
606   $aAmerican Politics
606   $aElectoral Politics
606   $aPolitical Sociology
606   $aPolitical Communication
615  0$aAmerica$xPolitics and government.
615  0$aElections.
615  0$aPolitical sociology.
615  0$aCommunication in politics.
615 14$aAmerican Politics.
615 24$aElectoral Politics.
615 24$aPolitical Sociology.
615 24$aPolitical Communication.
676   $a324.9730932
676   $a324.9730932
700   $aYates$b Heather E$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0786580
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910338028403321
996   $aPolitics of spectacle and emotion in the 2016 presidential campaign$91751853
997   $aUNINA