LEADER 00847nam0-22002771i-450- 001 990005084550403321 005 19990530 035 $a000508455 035 $aFED01000508455 035 $a(Aleph)000508455FED01 035 $a000508455 100 $a19990530g19549999km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 105 $ay-------001yy 200 1 $aHenri Heine$e"Romantique dèfroquè", héraut du Symbolisme frantais$fpar Kurt Weinberg 210 $aNew Haven [etc.]$cYale University Press [etc.]$d1954. 215 $a303 p.$d23 cm 300 $aInstitut d'Études Frantaises de Yale University (al front.). - 700 1$aWeinberg,$bKurt$0188965 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990005084550403321 952 $aTI 351$bFil.Mod. 11458$fFLFBC 959 $aFLFBC 996 $aHenri Heine$9536479 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03632nam 22005295 450 001 9910337912103321 005 20200702092039.0 010 $a3-319-90878-2 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-90878-6 035 $a(CKB)4100000004835582 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-90878-6 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5431155 035 $a(PPN)229497993 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000004835582 100 $a20180615d2019 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn|008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aDemocratic Acceptance of Spatial Planning Policy Measures /$fby Lyn Ellen Pleger 205 $a1st ed. 2019. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2019. 215 $a1 online resource (XVI, 205 p. 29 illus.) 311 $a3-319-90877-4 327 $aIntroduction -- Sustainable Spatial Planning in Democracies -- Democratic Acceptance of Spatial Planning Policies -- Determinants of Democratic Acceptance: A Two-Level Analysis -- The Motivation behind Democratic Acceptance: A Case Study -- Framing Effects on Democratic Acceptability: An Experimental Approach -- Discussion.-Conclusions. 330 $aThis book examines the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures, using Switzerland as a case study. The currently inefficient land use in industrialised countries calls for new spatial planning policies. Yet governments have largely failed to implement innovative policy measures, which may be due to a lack of democratic acceptance. To date, little is known about the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures. Switzerland offers a promising candidate because of its direct-democratic system, which allows citizens? preferences for specific policy measures to be directly measured. In this work, the democratic acceptance of spatial planning instruments is investigated from various perspectives in the form of original empirical studies, which are embedded in an innovative conceptual framework. It demonstrates that not only spatial planning instruments in general, but also incentive-based instruments in particular, generally enjoy high acceptance. This finding is remarkable, considering the fact that efficient land use instruments have only been marginally implemented. Addressing the needs of both academics and land use practitioners in the private and public sector, the book shows that in order to improve the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures, attention must be paid to their context, content and the means by which that content is provided. 606 $aRegional planning 606 $aCity planning 606 $aPolitical science 606 $aEnvironmental policy 606 $aLandscape/Regional and Urban Planning$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/J15000 606 $aPolitical Science$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911000 606 $aEnvironmental Politics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/U38000 615 0$aRegional planning. 615 0$aCity planning. 615 0$aPolitical science. 615 0$aEnvironmental policy. 615 14$aLandscape/Regional and Urban Planning. 615 24$aPolitical Science. 615 24$aEnvironmental Politics. 676 $a710 700 $aPleger$b Lyn Ellen$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0979424 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910337912103321 996 $aDemocratic Acceptance of Spatial Planning Policy Measures$92232946 997 $aUNINA