LEADER 03163nam  22005655  450 
001 9910337861703321
005 20250610110513.0
010   $a9783030047955
010   $a3030047954
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-04795-5
035   $a(CKB)4100000007587411
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-04795-5
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5649668
035   $a(PPN)259453269
035   $a(Perlego)3493091
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC29090940
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000007587411
100   $a20190125d2019      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurnn#008mamaa
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aDisaster Recovery Through the Lens of Justice /$fby Alessandra Jerolleman
205   $a1st ed. 2019.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Pivot,$d2019.
215   $a1 online resource (XI, 108 p.)
311 08$a9783030047948 
311 08$a3030047946 
327   $a1. Introduction -- 2. Deserving Victims and Post-Disaster Fraud -- 3. Survivor Agency -- 4. Public Policy and Legislation -- 5. Implementation -- 6. Disaster Risk Reduction and Creation Challenges -- 7. Disparate Outcomes -- 8. Conclusion: Resilience for Whom?.
330   $aThere has been increased attention to the topics of disaster recovery and disaster resilience over the past several years, particularly as catastrophic events such as Hurricane Katrina and Superstorm Sandy have brought to light the increasing vulnerability of so many communities. This manuscript brings together existing research, along with policy analysis, in order to look at disaster recovery through the lens of justice. This includes understanding the mechanisms through which vulnerability is exacerbated, and the extent to which the regulations and agency cultures drive this outcome. While existing analyses have sought to understand the particular characteristics of both resilient and vulnerable communities, there have been few attempts to understand the systemic inequities and injustice that is built into United States disaster policies, programs, and legislation. This manuscript thus begins from the understanding that social and economic structures, including land use policies andhistoric practices such as redlining, have concentrated hazard risk into vulnerable zones whose inhabitants do not benefit from the very policies that create and increase their risk. .
606   $aPolitical science
606   $aPolitical planning
606   $aPublic administration
606   $aGovernance and Government
606   $aPublic Policy
606   $aPublic Administration
615  0$aPolitical science.
615  0$aPolitical planning.
615  0$aPublic administration.
615 14$aGovernance and Government.
615 24$aPublic Policy.
615 24$aPublic Administration.
676   $a320.4
676   $a363.3480973
700   $aJerolleman$b Alessandra$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01062148
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910337861703321
996   $aDisaster Recovery Through the Lens of Justice$92523120
997   $aUNINA