LEADER 03379nam 22004935 450 001 9910337834403321 005 20230810164443.0 010 $a3-030-15590-0 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-15590-2 035 $a(CKB)4100000008424434 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5789419 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-15590-2 035 $a(PPN)258303824 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000008424434 100 $a20190612d2019 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aInterpretation without Truth $eA Realistic Enquiry /$fby Pierluigi Chiassoni 205 $a1st ed. 2019. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2019. 215 $a1 online resource (284 pages) 225 1 $aLaw and Philosophy Library,$x2215-0315 ;$v128 311 $a3-030-15588-9 327 $a1. Introduction: The Path of Analytical Realism -- 2. Interpretation, Truth, and the Logical Forms of Interpretive Discourse -- 3. Interpretive Games -- 4. Taking Context Seriously -- 5. Frames v. Containers -- 6. Towards Pragmatic Realism -- 7. Legal Gaps -- 8. Judicial Fictions -- 9. Precedent -- 10. Defeasibility and Legal Indeterminacy -- 11. Legislation. 330 $aThis book engages in an analytical and realistic enquiry into legal interpretation and a selection of related matters including legal gaps, judicial fictions, judicial precedent, legal defeasibility, and legislation. Chapter 1 provides an outline of the central theoretical and methodological tenets of analytical realism. Chapter 2 presents a conceptual apparatus concerning the phenomenon of legal interpretation, which it subsequently applies to investigate the truth-in-legal-interpretation issue. Chapters 3 to 6 argue for a theory of legal interpretation - pragmatic realism - by outlining a theory of interpretive games, revisiting the debate between literalism and contextualism in contemporary philosophy of language, and underscoring the many shortcomings of the container-retrieval view and pragmatic formalism. In turn, Chapter 7, focusing on comparative legal theory, advocates an interpretation-sensitive theory of legal gaps, as opposed to purely normativist ones. Chapter 8 explores the connection between judicial reasoning and judicial fictions, casting light on the structure and purpose of fictional reasoning. Chapter 9 provides an analytical enquiry into judicial precedent, examining a variety of ideal-typical systems in terms of their normative or de iure relevance. Chapter 10 addresses defeasibility and legal indeterminacy. In closing, Chapter 11 highlights the central tenets of a realistic theory of legislation. 410 0$aLaw and Philosophy Library,$x2215-0315 ;$v128 606 $aLaw$xPhilosophy 606 $aLaw$xHistory 606 $aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History 606 $aPhilosophy of Law 615 0$aLaw$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aLaw$xHistory. 615 14$aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. 615 24$aPhilosophy of Law. 676 $a340.1 676 $a340.115 700 $aChiassoni$b Pierluigi$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0254330 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910337834403321 996 $aInterpretation without Truth$91756618 997 $aUNINA