LEADER 03835nam  22005415  450 
001 9910337726103321
005 20200701175223.0
010   $a3-030-04568-4
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-04568-5
035   $a(CKB)4100000007204827
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5613392
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-04568-5
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000007204827
100   $a20181210d2019      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aInference in Argumentation $eA Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes /$fby Eddo Rigotti, Sara Greco
205   $a1st ed. 2019.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2019.
215   $a1 online resource (349 pages)
225 1 $aArgumentation Library,$x1566-7650 ;$v34
311   $a3-030-04566-8 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aAcknowledgement -- Preface -- Part I: The Tradition of Topics -- Chapter 1. Aristotle's foundation of topics: the foundation of the study of inference in argumentation -- Chapter 2. Cicero's Topica and the establishment of the topical tradition by Boethius -- Chapter 3. The richness and originality of medieval contributions -- Chapter 4. After the Middle Ages -- Chapter 5. Modern and contemporary approaches -- Part II: The Argumentum Model of Topics -- Chapter 6. The inferential configuration of arguments: the Argumentum Model of Topics -- Chapter 7. Advanced theoretical perspectives and open questions -- Chapter 8. Analysis and evaluation of arguments in context -- Appendix -- Index.
330   $aThis book investigates the role of inference in argumentation, considering how arguments support standpoints on the basis of different loci. The authors propose and illustrate a model for the analysis of the standpoint-argument connection, called Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT). A prominent feature of the AMT is that it distinguishes, within each and every single argumentation, between an inferential-procedural component, on which the reasoning process is based; and a material-contextual component, which anchors the argument in the interlocutors? cultural and factual common ground. The AMT explains how these components differ and how they are intertwined within each single argument. This model is introduced in Part II of the book, following a careful reconstruction of the enormously rich tradition of studies on inference in argumentation, from the antiquity to contemporary authors, without neglecting medieval and post-medieval contributions. The AMT is a contemporary model grounded in a dialogue with such tradition, whose crucial aspects are illuminated in this book. .
410  0$aArgumentation Library,$x1566-7650 ;$v34
606   $aComparative linguistics
606   $aLanguage and languages?Philosophy
606   $aCommunication
606   $aComparative Linguistics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/N19000
606   $aPhilosophy of Language$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E26000
606   $aCommunication Studies$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X28000
615  0$aComparative linguistics.
615  0$aLanguage and languages?Philosophy.
615  0$aCommunication.
615 14$aComparative Linguistics.
615 24$aPhilosophy of Language.
615 24$aCommunication Studies.
676   $a808.53
700   $aRigotti$b Eddo$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0132417
702   $aGreco$b Sara$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910337726103321
996   $aInference in Argumentation$92534116
997   $aUNINA