LEADER 03851nam  22006255  450 
001 9910337671103321
005 20200704043948.0
010   $a3-030-12627-7
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-12627-8
035   $a(CKB)4100000007823636
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5744648
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-12627-8
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000007823636
100   $a20190401d2019      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aVoting Procedures Under a Restricted Domain $eAn Examination of the (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Five Main Paradoxes /$fby Dan S. Felsenthal, Hannu Nurmi
205   $a1st ed. 2019.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2019.
215   $a1 online resource (100 pages)
225 1 $aSpringerBriefs in Economics,$x2191-5504
311   $a3-030-12626-9 
327   $aIntroduction -- 20 Voting Procedures Designed to Elect a Single Candidate -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Lack of Monotonicity in a Restricted Domain -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the Inconsistency Paradox (aka Reinforcement Paradox) in a Restricted Domain -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the No-Show Paradox in a Restricted Domain -- Which of the 20 Voting Procedures Satisfy or Violate the Subset Choice Condition (SCC) in a Restricted Domain? -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the Preference Inversion Paradox in a Restricted Domain -- Summary.
330   $aThis book deals with 20 voting procedures used or proposed for use in elections resulting in the choice of a single winner. These procedures are evaluated in terms of their ability to avoid five important paradoxes in a restricted domain, viz., when a Condorcet winner exists and is elected in the initial profile. Together with the two companion volumes by the same authors, published by Springer in 2017 and 2018, this book aims at giving a comprehensive overview of the most important advantages and disadvantages of voting procedures thereby assisting decision makers in the choice of a voting procedure that would best suit their purposes.
410  0$aSpringerBriefs in Economics,$x2191-5504
606   $aWelfare economics
606   $aElections
606   $aPolitical science$xPhilosophy
606   $aEconomics
606   $aDemocracy
606   $aSocial Choice/Welfare Economics/Public Choice/Political Economy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/W31020
606   $aElectoral Politics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911070
606   $aPolitical Philosophy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E37000
606   $aEconomic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/W29000
606   $aDemocracy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911050
615  0$aWelfare economics.
615  0$aElections.
615  0$aPolitical science$xPhilosophy.
615  0$aEconomics.
615  0$aDemocracy.
615 14$aSocial Choice/Welfare Economics/Public Choice/Political Economy.
615 24$aElectoral Politics.
615 24$aPolitical Philosophy.
615 24$aEconomic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods.
615 24$aDemocracy.
676   $a324.9
700   $aFelsenthal$b Dan S$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0855571
702   $aNurmi$b Hannu$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910337671103321
996   $aVoting Procedures Under a Restricted Domain$92289740
997   $aUNINA