LEADER 03469nam  22005535  450 
001 9910337500003321
005 20200705160631.0
010   $a3-030-01301-4
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-01301-1
035   $a(CKB)4100000007110747
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5615442
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-01301-1
035   $a(PPN)231462573
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000007110747
100   $a20181030d2019      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aGrantsmanship for New Investigators /$fby Thomas F. Hilton, Carl G. Leukefeld
205   $a1st ed. 2019.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2019.
215   $a1 online resource (123 pages)
225 1 $aSpringerBriefs in Public Health,$x2192-3698
311   $a3-030-01300-6 
327   $aExploring Funding Options -- Pursuing Federal Support -- Grant Mechanisms -- The Application Process -- Application Content -- Application Review -- Funding Institution Vetting.
330   $aThis compact resource analyzes and demystifies the processes of applying for, competing for, and getting funding for research. Neither a cookbook nor a template, it encourages readers to apply the critical thinking and attention to detail they use in their investigations to the pursuit of the grant. Chapters delve into choosing among funding options, project planning and writing, filling out the materials in the application packet, and troubleshooting for problems at various steps of the journey. Along the way, the authors also explore common myths of grantsmanship and alert readers to hidden pitfalls that can get an otherwise good submission rejected. Among the core skill areas covered: · Using strategic thinking throughout the application process · Understanding the major grant mechanisms · Navigating the grant timeline, including the peer review and the vetting process · Writing the effective project description · Following up if the project is not funded or funding is deferred · Building a career grant by grant Brimming with expert knowledge, Grantsmanship for New Investigators ably balances motivation with realism. The authors? deep understanding and experience of how funding agencies arrive at judgments will inspire readers to present their research in the most convincing manner.
410  0$aSpringerBriefs in Public Health,$x2192-3698
606   $aPublic health
606   $aExperiential research
606   $aMedical care
606   $aPublic Health$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/H27002
606   $aPsychology Research$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/Y20000
606   $aHealth Services Research$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/H81000
615  0$aPublic health.
615  0$aExperiential research.
615  0$aMedical care.
615 14$aPublic Health.
615 24$aPsychology Research.
615 24$aHealth Services Research.
676   $a658.15224
676   $a610.72
700   $aHilton$b Thomas F$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0108080
702   $aLeukefeld$b Carl G$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910337500003321
996   $aGrantsmanship for New Investigators$92546589
997   $aUNINA