LEADER 02138 am  22004453u 450 
001 9910330706503321
005 20230621135352.0
010   $a3-96110-186-8
024 7 $a10.5281/zenodo.3191825
035   $a(CKB)4100000008710974
035   $a(OAPEN)1005206
035   $a(ScCtBLL)97c2627e-b8a0-459e-96cc-7a9043f50679
035   $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/34436
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000008710974
100   $a20200310h20192019  fy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurmu#---auuuu
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aAnalogical classification in formal grammar /$fMati?as Guzma?n Naranjo
210   $cLanguage Science Press$d2019
210  1$aBerlin, Germany :$cLanguage Science Press,$d[2019]
210  4$d©2019
215   $a1 online resource (vii, 240 pages) $cPDF, digital file(s)
225 0 $aEmpirically oriented theoretical morphology and syntax ;$v5
311   $a3-96110-187-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
330   $aThe organization of the lexicon, and especially the relations between groups of lexemes is a strongly debated topic in linguistics. Some authors have insisted on the lack of any structure of the lexicon. In this vein, Di Sciullo & Williams (1987: 3) claim that ?[t]he lexicon is like a prison ? it contains only the lawless, and the only thing that its inmates have in commonis lawlessness?. In the alternative view, the lexicon is assumed to have a rich structure that captures all regularities and partial regularities that exist between lexical entries.Two very different schools of linguistics have insisted on the organization of the lexicon.
606   $aLinguistics$xMorphology
606   $aLinguistics$xSyntax
610   $aLinguistics
615  0$aLinguistics$xMorphology.
615  0$aLinguistics$xSyntax.
700   $aGuzmán Naranjo$b Matías$0987117
801  2$bUkMaJRU
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910330706503321
996   $aAnalogical classification in formal grammar$92255981
997   $aUNINA