LEADER 03434oam 22005413 450 001 9910313037203321 005 20230516195451.0 010 $a9781760462710 010 $a1760462713 024 8 $a10.22459/CA.2019 035 $a(CKB)4100000007808116 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5729198 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/34412 035 $a(ScCtBLL)8b6f7e96-1423-46da-8a42-4490fdabb9c7 035 $a(OCoLC)1159393455 035 $a(Perlego)3055768 035 $a(oapen)doab34412 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000007808116 100 $a20190402d2019 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 04$aThe court as archive /$feditors, Ann Genovese, Trish Luker, Kim Rubenstein 210 $cANU Press$d2019 210 1$aActon ACT, Australia :$cAustralian National University Press,$d[2019] 210 4$dİ2019 215 $a1 online resource (vii, 296 pages) $cillustrations 311 08$a9781760462703 311 08$a1760462705 330 $a"Until the late 20th century, ?an archive? generally meant a repository for documents, as well as the generic name for the wide range of documents the repository might hold. An archive could be visited, and then also searched, to discover past actions or lives that had meaning for the present. While historians and historiographers have long understood the contests that archives contain and represent, the very idea of ?the archive? has, over the last 40 years, become the subject and object of widening and intensified consideration. This consideration has been intellectual (from scholars in a wide range of disciplines) and public (from communities and individuals whose stories are held captive, or sometimes hidden or excluded from official archives), as well as institutional. It has involved scrutiny and critique of official archives? limitations and practices, as well as symbolic, affective and theoretical expansion and heightened expectation of what ?the archive? is or should be. The very language of ?the archive? now carries freight as administrative practice, normative value, metaphor, description and aspiration in different ways than it did in the 20th century. This collection offers a unique contribution to these reinvigorated and sometimes new conversations about what an archive might be, what it can do as a consequence, and to whom it bears custodial responsibilities. In particular, this collection addresses what it means for contemporary Australian superior courts of record to not only have constitutional and procedural duties to documents as a matter of law, but also to acknowledge obligations to care for those materials in a way that understands their public meaning and public value for the Australian people, in the past, in the present and for the future." 606 $aArchives$xAdministration 606 $aCourts$xArchival resources 615 0$aArchives$xAdministration. 615 0$aCourts$xArchival resources. 676 $a025.1714 700 $aGenovese$b Ann$4edt$01113245 702 $aGenovese$b Ann 702 $aLuker$b Trish 702 $aRubenstein$b Kim 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910313037203321 996 $aThe court as archive$93359074 997 $aUNINA