LEADER 03506nam 22006493 450 001 9910309959003321 005 20230621140202.0 010 $a0-472-90117-6 010 $a0-472-12429-3 024 7 $a10.3998/mpub.9946611 035 $a(CKB)4100000007133167 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5584095 035 $a(MiU)10.3998/mpub.9946611 035 $a(OCoLC)1041229289 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse72103 035 $a(ScCtBLL)175f784d-3e1e-4496-b954-05c74d2e9bd4 035 $aEBL7007910 035 $a(AU-PeEL)EBL7007910 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7007910 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000007133167 100 $a20180828h20182018 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aDrones and support for the use of force /$fJames Igoe Walsh and Marcus Schulzke 210 1$aAnn Arbor, Michigan :$cUniversity of Michigan Press,$d[2018] 210 4$dİ2018 215 $a1 online resource (253 pages) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 1 $a0-472-13101-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aDrones and support for the use of force -- Drones, casualties, and attitudes -- Drones and policy objectives -- Drones and moral hazard -- Drones and sensitivity to civilian harm -- Conclusion. 330 3 $a"Combat drones are transforming attitudes about the use of military force. Military casualties and the costs of conflict sap public support for war and for political and military leaders. Combat drones offer an unprecedented ability to reduce these costs by increasing accuracy, reducing the risks to civilians, and protecting military personnel from harm. These advantages should make drone strikes more popular than operations involving ground troops. Yet many critics believe drone warfare will make political leaders too willing to authorize wars, weakening constraints on the use of force. Because combat drones are relatively new, these arguments have been based on anecdotes, a handful of public opinion polls, or theoretical speculation. Drones and Support for the Use of Force uses experimental research to analyze the effects of combat drones on Americans' support for the use of force. The authors' findings-that drones have had important but nuanced effects on support for the use of force-have implications for democratic control of military action and civil-military relations and provide insight into how the proliferation of military technologies influences foreign policy." 606 $aDrone aircraft$xGovernment policy$zUnited States 606 $aWar$xPublic opinion 606 $aWar$xMoral and ethical aspects 606 $aDrone aircraft$xMoral and ethical aspects 606 $aWar and society$zUnited States 607 $aUnited States$xMilitary policy$xPublic opinion 607 $aUnited States$xPublic opinion 615 0$aDrone aircraft$xGovernment policy 615 0$aWar$xPublic opinion. 615 0$aWar$xMoral and ethical aspects. 615 0$aDrone aircraft$xMoral and ethical aspects. 615 0$aWar and society 676 $a358.4/14 700 $aWalsh$b James Igoe$0904045 702 $aSchulzke$b Marcus 712 02$aMichigan Publishing (University of Michigan) 801 0$bMiU 801 1$bMiU 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910309959003321 996 $aDrones and support for the use of force$92021010 997 $aUNINA