LEADER 03781nam 22006135 450 001 9910300633703321 005 20230810193321.0 010 $a3-319-74938-2 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-74938-9 035 $a(CKB)4100000002892367 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5401137 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-74938-9 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000002892367 100 $a20180321d2018 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aScientists, Democracy and Society $eA Community of Inquirers /$fby Pierluigi Barrotta 205 $a1st ed. 2018. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2018. 215 $a1 online resource (222 pages) 225 1 $aLogic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences,$x2214-9139 ;$v16 311 $a3-319-74937-4 327 $aChapter 1. Hume?s "law" and the ideal of value-free science -- Chapter 2. Concepts, values and scientific measurements -- Chapter 3. Values and inductive risk -- Chapter 4. Scientific research and the truth -- Chapter 5. Values and autonomy of science -- Chapter 6. Science, democracy and pragmatism. 330 $aThis monograph examines the relationship between science and democracy. The author argues that there is no clear-cut division between science and the rest of society. Rather, scientists and laypeople form a single community of inquiry, which aims at the truth. To defend his theory, the author shows that science and society are both heterogeneous and fragmented. They display variable and shifting alliances between components. He also explains how information flow between science and society is bi-directional through ?transactional? processes. In other words, science and society mutually define themselves. The author also explains how science is both objective and laden with values. Coverage includes a wide range of topics, such as: the ideal of value-free science, the is/ought divide, ?thick terms? and the language of science, inductive risk, the dichotomy between pure science and applied science, constructivism and the philosophy of risk. It also looks at the concepts of truth and objectivity, the autonomy of science, moral and social inquiry, perfectionism and democracy, and the role of experts in democratic societies. The style is philosophical, but the book features many examples and case-studies. It will appeal to philosophers of science, those in science and technology studies as well as interested general readers. 410 0$aLogic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences,$x2214-9139 ;$v16 606 $aSocial sciences$xPhilosophy 606 $aCommunication 606 $aMass media 606 $aTechnology$xSociological aspects 606 $aScience$xPhilosophy 606 $aSocial Philosophy 606 $aMedia and Communication 606 $aMedia Sociology 606 $aScience, Technology and Society 606 $aPhilosophy of Science 615 0$aSocial sciences$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aCommunication. 615 0$aMass media. 615 0$aTechnology$xSociological aspects. 615 0$aScience$xPhilosophy. 615 14$aSocial Philosophy. 615 24$aMedia and Communication. 615 24$aMedia Sociology. 615 24$aScience, Technology and Society. 615 24$aPhilosophy of Science. 676 $a303.483 700 $aBarrotta$b Pierluigi$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0253583 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910300633703321 996 $aScientists, Democracy and Society$92209062 997 $aUNINA