LEADER 03803nam  22005535  450 
001 9910300622503321
005 20200704095018.0
010   $a3-319-99435-2
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-99435-2
035   $a(CKB)4100000007127505
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5596940
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-99435-2
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000007127505
100   $a20181109d2018      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aCorrecting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity $eIn the Aftermath of Plagiarism /$fby M. V. Dougherty
205   $a1st ed. 2018.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2018.
215   $a1 online resource (255 pages)
225 1 $aResearch Ethics Forum,$x2212-9529 ;$v6
311   $a3-319-99434-4 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aPreface -- Introduction -- 1. Defining the Scholarly Record -- 2. What is Academic Plagiarism? -- 3. A Test Case for Published Corrections: The Discipline of Philosophy -- 4. Academic Whistleblowing -- 5. Publishing Corrections of the Scholarly Record: Some Test Cases -- 6. Contested Authorship, Self-Plagiarism, and the Scholarly Record -- Conclusion: Beyond the Published Retraction -- Index.
330   $aThis volume is the first book-length study on post-publication responses to academic plagiarism in humanities disciplines. It demonstrates that the correction of the scholarly literature for plagiarism is not a task for editors and publishers alone; each member of the research community has an indispensable role in maintaining the integrity of the published literature in the aftermath of plagiarism. If untreated, academic plagiarism damages the integrity of the scholarly record, corrupts the surrounding academic enterprise, and creates inefficiencies across all levels of knowledge production. By providing case studies from the field of philosophy and related disciplines, the volume exhibits that current post-publication responses to academic plagiarism are insufficient. It catalogues how humanities disciplines fall short in comparison with the natural and biomedical sciences for ensuring the integrity of the body of published research. This volume provides clarity about how to conceptualize the scholarly record, surveys the traditional methods for correcting it, and argues for new interventions to improve the reliability of the body of published research. The book is valuable not only to those in the field of philosophy and other humanities disciplines, but also to those interested in research ethics, meta-science, and the sociology of research.
410  0$aResearch Ethics Forum,$x2212-9529 ;$v6
606   $aResearch?Moral and ethical aspects
606   $aStudy skills
606   $aPrinting
606   $aPublishers and publishing
606   $aResearch Ethics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E14040
606   $aResearch Skills$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/O53060
606   $aPrinting and Publishing$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/421000
615  0$aResearch?Moral and ethical aspects.
615  0$aStudy skills.
615  0$aPrinting.
615  0$aPublishers and publishing.
615 14$aResearch Ethics.
615 24$aResearch Skills.
615 24$aPrinting and Publishing.
676   $a808.025
700   $aDougherty$b M. V$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0972608
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910300622503321
996   $aCorrecting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity$92225305
997   $aUNINA