LEADER 01088nam--2200349---450 001 990002260850203316 005 20211227103742.0 035 $a000226085 035 $aUSA01000226085 035 $a(ALEPH)000226085USA01 035 $a000226085 100 $a20041213d1981----km-y0itay0103----ba 101 $afre 102 $aFR 105 $aa|||||||001yy 200 1 $aNoirs et blancs en Afrique Equatoriale$eles societés cotieres et la pénétration française ver 1820-1874$fElikia M'Bokolo 210 $aParis$cMouton$d1981 215 $a302 p.$cill.$d24 cm 225 2 $aCivilisations et societés$v69 410 0$12001$aCivilisations et societés$v69 454 1$12001 461 1$1001-------$12001 607 0 $aGabon$xPenetrazione francese$xStoria$z1820-1874 676 $a967.2102 700 1$aM'BOKOLO,$bElikia$0244052 801 0$aIT$bsalbc$gISBD 912 $a990002260850203316 951 $aX.3.B. 5739 (Coll. HIR 69)$b24649 G.$cColl.$d00285363 959 $aBK 969 $aUMA 996 $aNoirs et Blancs en Afrique Equatoriale$9653213 997 $aUNISA LEADER 04711nam 22005055 450 001 9910300620803321 005 20200703152541.0 010 $a3-319-77320-8 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-77320-9 035 $a(CKB)4100000003359521 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5356134 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-77320-9 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000003359521 100 $a20180417d2018 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aInterpreting Plato Socratically $eSocrates and Justice /$fby J. Angelo Corlett 205 $a1st ed. 2018. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2018. 215 $a1 online resource (249 pages) 311 $a3-319-77319-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aPreface -- Introduction,- Chapter 1: Interpreting Plato Socratically,- Chapter 2: Defending The Socratic Interpretation of Plato?s Dialogues -- Chapter 3: In Defense of Socratic Studies -- Chapter 4: Socrates and Distributive Justice -- Chapter 5: Legal Obligation in Plato?s Crito -- Chapter 6: The Socratic Roots of Retributivism -- Chapter 7: Socrates and Compensatory Justice -- Conclusion -- Appendix I: Gerson on Cherniss On Aristotle On Plato -- Appendix II: The Concept of Art of Mimêsis in Plato?s Dialogues -- additional Bibliography -- Index. 330 $aJ. Angelo Corlett?s new book, Interpreting Plato Socratically continues the critical discussion of the Platonic Question where Corlett?s book, Interpreting Plato?s Dialogues concluded. New arguments in favor of the Mouthpiece Interpretation of Plato?s works are considered and shown to be fallacious, as are new objections to some competing approaches to Plato?s works. The Platonic Question is the problem of how to approach and interpret Plato?s writings most of which are dialogues. How, if at all, can Plato?s beliefs, doctrines, theories and such be extracted from dialogues where there is no direct indication from Plato that his own views are even to be found therein? Most philosophers of Plato attempt to decipher from Plato?s texts seemingly all manner of ideas expressed by Socrates which they then attribute to Plato. They seek to ascribe to Plato particular views about justice, art, love, virtue, knowledge, and the like because, they believe, Socrates is Plato?s mouthpiece throughout the dialogues. But is such an approach justified? What are the arguments in favor of such an approach? Is there a viable alternative approach to Plato?s dialogues? In this rigorous account of the dominant approach to Plato?s dialogues, there is no room left for reasonable doubt about the problematic reasons given for the notion that Plato?s dialogues reveal either Plato?s or Socrates? beliefs, doctrines or theories about substantive philosophical matters. Corlett?s approach to Plato?s dialogues is applied to a variety of passages throughout Plato?s works on a wide range of topics concerning justice. In-depth discussions of themes such as legal obligation, punishment and compensatory justice are clarified and with some surprising results. Plato?s works serve as a rich source of philosophical thinking about such matters. A central question in today?s Platonic studies is whether Socrates, or any other protagonist in the dialogues, presents views that the author wanted to assert or defend. Professor Corlett offers a detailed defense of his view that the role of Socrates is to raise questions rather than to provide the author?s answers to them. This defense is timely as intellectual historians consider the part played by Academic scholars centuries after Plato in systematizing Platonism. J. J. Mulhern, University of Pennsylvania. 606 $aPhilosophy 606 $aPhilology 606 $aPhilosophy, Ancient 606 $aHistory of Philosophy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E15000 606 $aClassical Studies$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/728000 606 $aClassical Philosophy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E12000 615 0$aPhilosophy. 615 0$aPhilology. 615 0$aPhilosophy, Ancient. 615 14$aHistory of Philosophy. 615 24$aClassical Studies. 615 24$aClassical Philosophy. 676 $a184 700 $aCorlett$b J. Angelo$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0597278 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910300620803321 996 $aInterpreting Plato Socratically$92124605 997 $aUNINA