LEADER 04322nam 22006135 450 001 9910300615203321 005 20240619233609.0 010 $a3-319-95381-8 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6 035 $a(CKB)4100000005323102 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-95381-6 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6312712 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000005323102 100 $a20180727d2018 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn#008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aArgumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective /$fby Frans H. van Eemeren 205 $a1st ed. 2018. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2018. 215 $a1 online resource (XI, 199 p. 10 illus.) 225 1 $aArgumentation Library,$x1566-7650 ;$v33 311 $a3-319-95380-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aChapter 1. Argumentation theory as a discipline -- Chapter 2. Building a theory of argumentation -- Chapter 3. A model of a critical discussion -- Chapter 4. Critical discussion and the identification of fallacies -- Chapter 5. Descriptive studies of argumentative discourse -- Chapter 6. Analysis as resolution-oriented reconstruction -- Chapter 7. Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse -- Chapter 8. Distinguishing between different kinds of argumentative practices -- Chapter 9. Prototypical argumentative patterns -- Chapter 10. Pragma-dialectics amidst other approaches to argumentation. 330 $aThe book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argumentation theory. In presenting this overview, argumentation is consistently approached from a pragma-dialectical perspective by viewing it pragmatically as a goal-directed communicative activity and dialectically as part of a regulated critical exchange aimed at resolving a difference of opinion. As a result, the book also systematically explains how the constitutive parts of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, which are discussed in a number of separate publications, hang together. The following crucial topics are discussed: (1) argumentation theory as a discipline; (2) the meta-theoretical principles of pragma-dialectics; (3) the model of a critical discussion aimed at resolving a difference of opinion; (4) fallacies as violations of a code of conduct for reasonable argumentative discourse; (5) descriptive research of argumentative reality; (6) analysis as theoretically-motivated reconstruction; (7) strategic manoeuvring aimed at combining achieving effectiveness with maintaining reasonableness; (8) the conventionalization of argumentative practices; (9) prototypical argumentative patterns; (10) pragma-dialectics amidst other approaches. Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective is clearly written and makes argumentation theory understandable to all scholars and advanced students interested in argumentation research. 410 0$aArgumentation Library,$x1566-7650 ;$v33 606 $aBusiness ethics 606 $aPolitical science$xPhilosophy 606 $aSocial sciences?Philosophy 606 $aEthics 606 $aBusiness Ethics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E14050 606 $aPolitical Philosophy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E37000 606 $aSocial Philosophy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E43000 606 $aMoral Philosophy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E41000 615 0$aBusiness ethics. 615 0$aPolitical science$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aSocial sciences?Philosophy. 615 0$aEthics. 615 14$aBusiness Ethics. 615 24$aPolitical Philosophy. 615 24$aSocial Philosophy. 615 24$aMoral Philosophy. 676 $a808 700 $aEemeren$b F. H. van$g(Frans Hendrik),$f1946-$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0850183 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910300615203321 996 $aArgumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective$94167473 997 $aUNINA