LEADER 03923nam  22006015  450 
001 9910300605603321
005 20200630010316.0
010   $a3-319-74645-6
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-74645-6
035   $a(CKB)4100000002892342
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5340120
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-74645-6
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000002892342
100   $a20180321d2018      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aLegalising Mitochondrial Donation $eEnacting Ethical Futures in UK Biomedical Politics   /$fby Rebecca Dimond, Neil Stephens
205   $a1st ed. 2018.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Pivot,$d2018.
215   $a1 online resource (149 pages)
311   $a3-319-74644-8 
327   $a1. Mitochondrial donation and UK biomedical politics -- 2. Contesting mitochondrial donation: the cluster for -- 3. Contesting mitochondrial donation: the cluster against -- 4. Policy work and legitimacy at Nuffield Council on Bioethics, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, and the Department of Health -- 5. Campaigning: contested meanings, patient-families, and last minute labours -- 6. The parliamentary debates -- 7. Enacting ethical futures.
330   $aIn 2015 the UK became the first country in the world to legalise mitochondrial donation, a controversial germ line reproductive technology to prevent the transmission of mitochondrial disease. Dimond and Stephens track the intense period of scientific and ethical review, public consultation and parliamentary debates preceeding the decision. They draw on stakeholder accounts and public documents to explore how patients, professionals, institutions and publics mobilised within ?for? and ?against? clusters, engaging in extensive promissory, emotional, bureaucratic, ethical, embodied and clinical labour to justify competing visions of an ethical future. They describe how this decision is the latest iteration of a UK sociotechnical imaginary in which the further liberalization of human embryo research and use is rendered legitimate and ethical through modes of consultation and permissive but strictly regulated licensing. Overall, this book presents a timely, multi-dimensional, and sociological account of a globally significant landmark in the history of human genetics, and will be relevant to those with an interest in genetics, Science, Technology and Society, the sociology of medicine, reproductive technology, and public policy debate.
606   $aSocial medicine
606   $aBioethics
606   $aHistory
606   $aSocial policy
606   $aPhilosophy
606   $aMedical Sociology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X22150
606   $aBioethics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E14010
606   $aHistory of Science$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/731000
606   $aSocial Policy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X33000
606   $aPhilosophy of Technology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E34050
615  0$aSocial medicine.
615  0$aBioethics.
615  0$aHistory.
615  0$aSocial policy.
615  0$aPhilosophy.
615 14$aMedical Sociology.
615 24$aBioethics.
615 24$aHistory of Science.
615 24$aSocial Policy.
615 24$aPhilosophy of Technology.
676   $a176
700   $aDimond$b Rebecca$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0902453
702   $aStephens$b Neil$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910300605603321
996   $aLegalising Mitochondrial Donation$92017415
997   $aUNINA