LEADER 03717nam 22006375 450 001 9910300517303321 005 20200630100503.0 010 $a3-319-71201-2 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-71201-7 035 $a(CKB)4100000001795326 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-71201-7 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5216658 035 $a(PPN)259463213 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000001795326 100 $a20180108d2018 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn|008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aRevisiting Metaphors in International Relations Theory /$fby Michael P. Marks 205 $a1st ed. 2018. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2018. 215 $a1 online resource (IX, 235 p.) 311 $a3-319-71200-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $a1. The Significance of Metaphors in International Relations Theory -- 2. Metaphors of International Political Economy -- 3. Metaphors of Democratization -- 4. Theoretical Reflection -- 5. The Role of Metaphors in International Relations Theory. 330 $aThis book presents an analysis of how metaphors are essential elements in the study of international relations. It acknowledges the fact that theory and practice in international relations often rest on common metaphorical concepts which have implications for the ways people around the world pursue their lives. Because of the increased attention metaphors have received as integral elements in political discourse, there is a need to investigate metaphorical concepts that are not neutral in their implications for understanding international relations. Inasmuch as government policy is shaped by metaphorical concepts that originate in the academic realm, and given that scholarly works are therefore partially involved in inspiring policy, the author subjects a range of metaphors in international relations theory to critical interrogation. Michael P. Marks is Professor of Politics at Willamette University in Salem, Oregon, US, and the author of a companion book Metaphors in International Relations Theory (Palgrave Macmillan 2011). 606 $aInternational relations 606 $aDiscourse analysis 606 $aPolitical communication 606 $aGlobalization 606 $aDiplomacy 606 $aInternational Relations Theory$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/912110 606 $aDiscourse Analysis$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/N51000 606 $aPolitical Communication$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911030 606 $aForeign Policy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/912040 606 $aGlobalization$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/912030 606 $aDiplomacy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/912020 615 0$aInternational relations. 615 0$aDiscourse analysis. 615 0$aPolitical communication. 615 0$aGlobalization. 615 0$aDiplomacy. 615 14$aInternational Relations Theory. 615 24$aDiscourse Analysis. 615 24$aPolitical Communication. 615 24$aForeign Policy. 615 24$aGlobalization. 615 24$aDiplomacy. 676 $a327.101 700 $aMarks$b Michael P$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0924524 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910300517303321 996 $aRevisiting Metaphors in International Relations Theory$92235878 997 $aUNINA