LEADER 01647oam 2200493Ka 450 001 9910698895703321 005 20090505084603.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000002396904 035 $a(OCoLC)320230169 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002396904 100 $a20090505d1987 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aDynamic analysis of the large deployable reflector$b[electronic resource] /$fRobert E. Calleson, A. Don Scott 210 1$aHampton, Va. :$cNational Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center,$d[1987] 215 $a1 volume 225 1 $aNASA technical memorandum ;$v89056 300 $aTitle from title screen (viewed May 4, 2009) 606 $aAstronomical observatories$2nasat 606 $aDynamic response$2nasat 606 $aDynamic structural analysis$2nasat 606 $aLarge Deployable Reflector$2nasat 606 $aLarge space structures$2nasat 606 $aMirrors$2nasat 606 $aOrbital assembly$2nasat 615 7$aAstronomical observatories. 615 7$aDynamic response. 615 7$aDynamic structural analysis. 615 7$aLarge Deployable Reflector. 615 7$aLarge space structures. 615 7$aMirrors. 615 7$aOrbital assembly. 700 $aCalleson$b Robert E$01403007 701 $aScott$b A. Don$01403008 712 02$aLangley Research Center. 801 0$bGPO 801 1$bGPO 801 2$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910698895703321 996 $aDynamic analysis of the large deployable reflector$93474713 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04517nam 22007455 450 001 9910300053503321 005 20200702221854.0 010 $a3-319-89348-3 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-89348-8 035 $a(CKB)3850000000033206 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-89348-8 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5448114 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5448114 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11591620 035 $a(OCoLC)1044859059 035 $a(PPN)229505368 035 $a(EXLCZ)993850000000033206 100 $a20180704d2018 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn|008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aCognition of the Law $eToward a Cognitive Sociology of Law and Behavior /$fby Luigi Cominelli 205 $a1st ed. 2018. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2018. 215 $a1 online resource (XII, 198 p.) 311 $a3-319-89347-5 327 $a1 The Social Subject as a Legal Actor -- 2 The Psychic Subject as a Legal Actor -- 3 Nature, Evolution, and Law -- 4 Cognition and the Law -- 5 Conclusion. 330 $aThis book?s basic hypothesis ? which it proposes to test with a cognitive-sociological approach ? is that legal behavior, like every form of human behavior, is directed and framed by biosocial constraints that are neither entirely genetic nor exclusively cultural. As such, from a sociological perspective the law can be seen as a super-meme, that is, as a biosocial constraint that develops only in complex societies. This super-meme theory, by highlighting a fundamental distinction between defensive and assertive biases, might explain the false contradiction between law as a static and historical phenomenon, and law as a dynamic and promotional element. Socio-legal scholars today have to face the challenge of pursuing a truly interdisciplinary approach, connecting all the fields that can contribute to building a modern theory of normative behavior and social action. Understanding and framing concepts such as rationality, emotion, or justice can help to overcome the significant divide between micro and macro sociological knowledge. Social scientists who are interested in the law must be able to master the epistemological discourses of different disciplines, and to produce fruitful syntheses and bridge-operations so as to understand the legal phenomenon from each different point of view. The book adopts four perspectives: sociological, psychological, biological-evolutionary and cognitive. All of them have the potential to be mutually integrated, and constitute that general social science that provides common ground for exchange. The goal is to arrive at a broad and integrated view of the socio-legal phenomenon, paving the way for a comprehensive theory of norm-oriented and norm-perceived actions. 606 $aLaw?Philosophy 606 $aLaw 606 $aBehavioral sciences 606 $aPsychology 606 $aSociology 606 $aNeurosciences 606 $aKnowledge, Theory of 606 $aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R11011 606 $aBehavioral Sciences$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/L13009 606 $aLaw and Psychology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/Y34000 606 $aSociology, general$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X22000 606 $aNeurosciences$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/B18006 606 $aEpistemology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E13000 615 0$aLaw?Philosophy. 615 0$aLaw. 615 0$aBehavioral sciences. 615 0$aPsychology. 615 0$aSociology. 615 0$aNeurosciences. 615 0$aKnowledge, Theory of. 615 14$aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. 615 24$aBehavioral Sciences. 615 24$aLaw and Psychology. 615 24$aSociology, general. 615 24$aNeurosciences. 615 24$aEpistemology. 676 $a340.1 700 $aCominelli$b Luigi$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0498405 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910300053503321 996 $aCognition of the Law$91916556 997 $aUNINA