LEADER 03796nam  22006135  450 
001 9910300051103321
005 20200707001511.0
010   $a3-030-01189-5
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-01189-5
035   $a(CKB)4100000007102892
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5566810
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-01189-5
035   $a(PPN)231462123
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000007102892
100   $a20181022d2018      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $2rdacontent
182   $2rdamedia
183   $2rdacarrier
200 10$aFrom Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court $eOptions Regarding the Institutionalization of Investor-State Dispute Settlement /$fby Marc Bungenberg, August Reinisch
205   $a1st ed. 2018.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2018.
215   $a1 online resource (213 pages)
225 1 $aSpecial Issue,$x2510-6880
311   $a3-030-01188-7 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $aExecutive Summary -- Introduction -- Targets for the Reorganization of the Investment Protection Regime -- Design and Implementation of a Two-Tiered MIC -- Applicable Law -- Pronoucement of Decisions and Consequences -- Recognition and Enforcement of Awards.-Possibilities for the Establishment of an MIC and a Possible Connection to Existing Institutions and System Conformity -- Pure Appelate Body/Pur Appeal Mechanism - "Multilateral Investment Appeals Mechanism".
330   $aThis book considers the potential setup for a future Multilateral Investment Court (MIC). The option of an MIC was first discussed by the EU Commission in 2016 and has since been made an official element of the EU Common Commercial Policy. In 2017, UNCITRAL also decided to discuss the possibility of an MIC, and on 20 March 2018, the Council of the EU gave the EU Commission the mandate to negotiate the creation of an MIC. The ?feasibility study? presented here is intended to contribute to a broader discussion on the options for a new international court specialized in investment protection. The cornerstones of such a new permanent court are a strict orientation on the rule of law, reduced costs of investment protection, transparency considerations, aspects of consistency in case law, and the effective enforceability of MIC decisions.
410  0$aSpecial Issue,$x2510-6880
606   $aMediation
606   $aDispute resolution (Law)
606   $aConflict management
606   $aInternational law
606   $aTrade
606   $aDispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R22000
606   $aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R19050
606   $aSources and Subjects of International Law, International Organizations$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R19010
615  0$aMediation.
615  0$aDispute resolution (Law).
615  0$aConflict management.
615  0$aInternational law.
615  0$aTrade.
615 14$aDispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration.
615 24$aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law.
615 24$aSources and Subjects of International Law, International Organizations.
676   $a347.09
676   $a346.092
700   $aBungenberg$b Marc$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0787615
702   $aReinisch$b August$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910300051103321
996   $aFrom Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court$92092096
997   $aUNINA