LEADER 04144nam  22006615  450 
001 9910300047903321
005 20200630150432.0
010   $a3-319-65488-8
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-65488-1
035   $a(CKB)4100000001382325
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-65488-1
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5210928
035   $a(PPN)222230266
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000001382325
100   $a20171229d2018      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurnn|008mamaa
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aPatterns of Treaty Interpretation as Anti-Fragmentation Tools $eA Comparative Analysis with a Special Focus on the ECtHR, WTO and ICJ /$fby Liliana E. Popa
205   $a1st ed. 2018.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2018.
215   $a1 online resource (XXIV, 379 p.) 
311   $a3-319-65487-X 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $a1. Introduction -- 2. Does Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies Lead to the Fragmentation Law? -- 3. Treaty Interpretation -- 4. PCIJ/ICJ Practice on Treaty Interpretation -- 5. Treaty Interpretation at the European Court of Human Rights -- 6. Treaty Interpretation at the World Trade Organization -- 7. Conclusions.
330   $aThis book investigates whether treaty interpretation at the ECtHR and WTO, which are sometimes perceived as promoting ?self-contained? regimes, could constitute a means for unifying international law, or, conversely, might exacerbate the fragmentation of international law. In this regard, the practice of the ICJ on treaty interpretation is used for comparison, since the ICJ has made the greatest contribution to the development and clarification of international law rules and principles. Providing a critical analysis of cases at the ICJ, ECtHR and WTO, both prior to and since the adoption of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the book reveals how the ECtHR and WTO apply the general rules of treaty interpretation in patterns which are similar to those used by the ICJ to address difficulties in interpreting the text of treaties. Viewed in the light of the ECtHR?s and WTO?s interpretative practices, both the VCLT?s general rules of interpretation and the ICJ?s interpretative practice serve to counteract the fragmentation of international law.  .
606   $aInternational law
606   $aLaw?Philosophy
606   $aLaw
606   $aPrivate international law
606   $aConflict of laws
606   $aTrade
606   $aHuman rights
606   $aSources and Subjects of International Law, International Organizations$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R19010
606   $aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R11011
606   $aPrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law $3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R14002
606   $aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R19050
606   $aHuman Rights$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R19020
615  0$aInternational law.
615  0$aLaw?Philosophy.
615  0$aLaw.
615  0$aPrivate international law.
615  0$aConflict of laws.
615  0$aTrade.
615  0$aHuman rights.
615 14$aSources and Subjects of International Law, International Organizations.
615 24$aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
615 24$aPrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law .
615 24$aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law.
615 24$aHuman Rights.
676   $a341
700   $aPopa$b Liliana E$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0961487
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910300047903321
996   $aPatterns of Treaty Interpretation as Anti-Fragmentation Tools$92179756
997   $aUNINA