LEADER 04186nam 22006495 450 001 9910300047103321 005 20200704202518.0 010 $a981-10-8869-1 024 7 $a10.1007/978-981-10-8869-8 035 $a(CKB)4100000002892709 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5358145 035 $a(DE-He213)978-981-10-8869-8 035 $a(PPN)225548798 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000002892709 100 $a20180309d2018 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aDiscretionary Police Powers to Punish $eA Case Study of Victoria?s Banning Notice Provisions /$fby Clare Farmer 205 $a1st ed. 2018. 210 1$aSingapore :$cSpringer Singapore :$cImprint: Springer,$d2018. 215 $a1 online resource (80 pages) 225 1 $aSpringerBriefs in Criminology,$x2192-8533 311 $a981-10-8868-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aAcknowledgments -- Introduction -- Preventive Justice -- Over the past decade anti-social behaviour and alcohol-related violence in and around -- Oversight and Balance in the Criminal Justice System -- Victoria?s Banning Notice Provisions -- Overview of Victoria?s Banning Notice Provisions -- Research Methodology -- Rationale Underpinning Victoria?s Banning Notice Provisions -- Scrutiny of Victoria?s Banning Notice Provisions -- Discussion -- Reference List -- Glossary of Key Terms -- Index. 330 $aThis book uses an Australian case study to shine a much-needed spotlight on discretionary police powers to punish, and their implications for justice and human rights. It offers a revealing analysis of the problematic rationales that secured the legislative passage of banning notice provisions through the State Parliament of Victoria, Australia in 2007, which occurred amidst similar developments in other jurisdictions across the world: in the UK, New Labour?s ?tough on crime? initiative in the 1990s, responses to the post 9/11 terror threat, and more recent lockout laws in Sydney, Australia. The Victorian case study offers a range of datasets including Hansard parliamentary debates, Victoria Police data, media coverage and interviews with magistrates. This material provides critical insights into the broader consequences of discretionary police powers, including their effect upon the separation of powers, individual rights, and the steady and largely unchecked proliferation of discretionary police powers across most Australian jurisdictions. On the tenth anniversary of these first Victorian on-the-spot banning powers, this Brief provides a sound basis for subsequent criminological explorations of the effectiveness of banning in tackling issues of disorder, deterrence and punishment, and of the broader challenge of balancing individual rights and community protection. 410 0$aSpringerBriefs in Criminology,$x2192-8533 606 $aPolice 606 $aSociology, Urban 606 $aHuman rights 606 $aCriminology 606 $aCriminal justice, Administration of 606 $aPolicing$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/1B2000 606 $aUrban Studies/Sociology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X22250 606 $aHuman Rights and Crime $3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/1BB020 606 $aCriminal Justice$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/1BB010 615 0$aPolice. 615 0$aSociology, Urban. 615 0$aHuman rights. 615 0$aCriminology. 615 0$aCriminal justice, Administration of. 615 14$aPolicing. 615 24$aUrban Studies/Sociology. 615 24$aHuman Rights and Crime . 615 24$aCriminal Justice. 676 $a363.2 700 $aFarmer$b Clare$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0995618 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910300047103321 996 $aDiscretionary Police Powers to Punish$92281425 997 $aUNINA