LEADER 03286nam  22005295  450 
001 9910300030703321
005 20200704183829.0
010   $a3-319-95258-7
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-95258-1
035   $a(CKB)4100000005958472
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5497170
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-95258-1
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000005958472
100   $a20180822d2018      u|             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 14$aThe Rational Shakespeare$b[electronic resource] $ePeter Ramus, Edward de Vere, and the Question of Authorship /$fby Michael Wainwright
205   $a1st ed. 2018.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2018.
215   $a1 online resource (328 pages) $cillustrations
311   $a3-319-95257-9 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aChapter 1 Peter Ramus and the Basis of Logic -- Chapter 2 Thomas Smith, Edward de Vere, and William Cecil -- Chapter 3 Peter Ramus, Edward de Oxford, and the Basis of Logic -- Chapter 4 Ramus?s Method -- Chapter 5 The Strengths and Weakness of Ramism -- Chapter 6 Introduction: Ramism and Game Theory -- Chapter 7 The Banker and His Player -- Chapter 8 Oxford, Ramus, and Love?s Labour?s Lost -- Chapter 9 Oxford, Ramus, and Hamlet, Prince of Denmark -- Chapter 10 Deadlock and the Prisoner?s Dilemma in King John -- Chapter 11 Assurance Games in Antony and Cleopatra (Part 1) -- Chapter 12 Assurance Games in Antony and Cleopatra (Part 2) -- Chapter 13 Chicken in King Henry V (Part 1) -- Chapter 14 Chicken in King Henry V (Part 2) -- Chapter 15 Conclusion.
330   $aThe Rational Shakespeare: Peter Ramus, Edward de Vere, and the Question of Authorship examines William Shakespeare?s rationality from a Ramist perspective, linking that examination to the leading intellectuals of late humanism, and extending those links to the life of Edward de Vere, Seventeenth Earl of Oxford. The application to Shakespeare?s plays and sonnets of a game-theoretic hermeneutic, an interpretive approach that Ramism suggests but ultimately evades, strengthens these connections in further supporting the Oxfordian answer to the question of Shakespearean authorship.
606   $aLiterature?History and criticism
606   $aLiterature, Modern
606   $aShakespeare, William, 1564-1616
606   $aLogic
606   $aLiterary History$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/813000
606   $aShakespeare$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/817010
606   $aLogic$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E16000
615  0$aLiterature?History and criticism.
615  0$aLiterature, Modern.
615  0$aShakespeare, William, 1564-1616.
615  0$aLogic.
615 14$aLiterary History.
615 24$aShakespeare.
615 24$aLogic.
676   $a822.308
700   $aWainwright$b Michael$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0846441
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910300030703321
996   $aThe Rational Shakespeare$92260879
997   $aUNINA