LEADER 03995nam  22007455  450 
001 9910299662903321
005 20230810184018.0
010   $a3-319-11400-X
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2
035   $a(CKB)3710000000269655
035   $a(EBL)1967818
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001372486
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11802177
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001372486
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11303932
035   $a(PQKB)10568045
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-11400-2
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1967818
035   $a(PPN)182099288
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000269655
100   $a20141029d2015      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aInterdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims /$fby C. F. Gethmann, M. Carrier, G. Hanekamp, M. Kaiser, G. Kamp, S. Lingner, M. Quante, F. Thiele
205   $a1st ed. 2015.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2015.
215   $a1 online resource (207 p.)
225 1 $aEthics of Science and Technology Assessment,$x1860-4811 ;$v43
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a3-319-11399-2 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $aIntroduction -- Science in Society -- Knowing and Acting -- Trans-disciplinary Deliberation -- Conclusions/Recommandations.
330   $aInterdisciplinarity has seemingly become a paradigm for modern and meaningful research. Clearly, the interdisciplinary modus of deliberation enables to unfold relevant but quite different disciplinary perspectives to the reflection of broader scientific questions or societal problems. However, whether the comprehensive results of interdisciplinary reflection prove to be valid or to be acceptable in trans-disciplinary terms depends upon certain preconditions, which have to be fulfilled for securing scientific quality and social trust in advisory contexts. The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.
410  0$aEthics of Science and Technology Assessment,$x1860-4811 ;$v43
606   $aScience$xPhilosophy
606   $aEconomic development
606   $aKnowledge, Sociology of
606   $aPhilosophy of Science
606   $aEconomic Development, Innovation and Growth
606   $aSociology of Knowledge and Discourse
615  0$aScience$xPhilosophy.
615  0$aEconomic development.
615  0$aKnowledge, Sociology of.
615 14$aPhilosophy of Science.
615 24$aEconomic Development, Innovation and Growth.
615 24$aSociology of Knowledge and Discourse.
676   $a10
676   $a306.42
676   $a338926
676   $a501
700   $aGethmann$b C. F$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01057839
702   $aCarrier$b M$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
702   $aHanekamp$b G$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
702   $aKaiser$b M$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
702   $aKamp$b G$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
702   $aLingner$b S$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
702   $aQuante$b M$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
702   $aThiele$b F$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910299662903321
996   $aInterdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims$92494870
997   $aUNINA