LEADER 04231nam 22007935 450 001 9910299661503321 005 20200703113016.0 010 $a3-319-09159-X 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-09159-4 035 $a(CKB)3710000000230734 035 $a(EBL)1966969 035 $a(OCoLC)908086419 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001353963 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11733454 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001353963 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11322653 035 $a(PQKB)10803307 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-09159-4 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1966969 035 $a(PPN)181349736 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000230734 100 $a20140905d2015 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aHeuristic Reasoning /$fedited by Emiliano Ippoliti 205 $a1st ed. 2015. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2015. 215 $a1 online resource (194 p.) 225 1 $aStudies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics,$x2192-6255 ;$v16 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a3-319-09158-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aReasoning at the frontier of knowledge: Introductory essay -- Why should the logic of discovery be revived? A reappraisal -- Are Heuristics Knowledge-Enhancing?Abduction, Models, and Fictions in Science -- Heuristic Appraisal at the Frontier of Research -- Why do Scientific Revolutions begin? -- Withstanding Tensions: Scientific Disagreement and Epistemic Tolerance -- Heuristics as Methods:  Validity, Reliability and Velocity -- Dynamic generation of hypotheses: Mandelbrot, Soros and Far-From-Equilibrium. 330 $aHow can we advance knowledge? Which methods do we need in order to make new discoveries? How can we rationally evaluate, reconstruct and offer discoveries as a means of improving the ?method? of discovery itself? And how can we use findings about scientific discovery to boost funding policies, thus fostering a deeper impact of scientific discovery itself? The respective chapters in this book provide readers with answers to these questions. They focus on a set of issues that are essential to the development of types of reasoning for advancing knowledge, such as models for both revolutionary findings and paradigm shifts; ways of rationally addressing scientific disagreement, e.g. when a revolutionary discovery sparks considerable disagreement inside the scientific community; frameworks for both discovery and inference methods; and heuristics for economics and the social sciences. 410 0$aStudies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics,$x2192-6255 ;$v16 606 $aComputational intelligence 606 $aPhilosophy and science 606 $aOperations research 606 $aDecision making 606 $aLogic 606 $aKnowledge, Theory of 606 $aComputational Intelligence$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/T11014 606 $aPhilosophy of Science$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E34000 606 $aOperations Research/Decision Theory$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/521000 606 $aLogic$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E16000 606 $aEpistemology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E13000 615 0$aComputational intelligence. 615 0$aPhilosophy and science. 615 0$aOperations research. 615 0$aDecision making. 615 0$aLogic. 615 0$aKnowledge, Theory of. 615 14$aComputational Intelligence. 615 24$aPhilosophy of Science. 615 24$aOperations Research/Decision Theory. 615 24$aLogic. 615 24$aEpistemology. 676 $a006.3 676 $a120 676 $a160 676 $a501 702 $aIppoliti$b Emiliano$4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910299661503321 996 $aHeuristic Reasoning$91465980 997 $aUNINA