LEADER 03930nam 22006375 450 001 9910299403003321 005 20200703104925.0 010 $a3-319-70890-2 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-70890-4 035 $a(CKB)4340000000223562 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-70890-4 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5161687 035 $z(PPN)258863331 035 $a(PPN)221252932 035 $a(EXLCZ)994340000000223562 100 $a20171124d2018 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn|008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aGround-penetrating Radar and Magnetometry for Buried Landscape Analysis /$fby Lawrence B. Conyers 205 $a1st ed. 2018. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2018. 215 $a1 online resource (XII, 109 p. 68 illus., 66 illus. in color.) 225 1 $aSpringerBriefs in Geography,$x2211-4165 311 $a3-319-70889-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters. 327 $aChapter 1 -- Introduction -- Chapter 2 -- Ground-penetrating Radar -- Chapter 3 -- Magnetometry -- Chapter 4 -- Small Roman Site in Croatia -- Chapter 5 -- Roman Temple in England -- Chapter 6 -- Early Colonial Site in Connecticut -- Chapter 7 -- Medieval site in Ireland -- Chapter 8 -- Hunter-gatherer Site in Colorado -- Chapter 9 -- Conclusions -- References. 330 $aThis book presents the integrated use of magnetometry and ground-penetrating radar geophysical mapping to understand the human presence within buried archaeological landscapes. Ground-penetrating radar can be used to identify buried living surfaces, geological stratigraphy and the architectural remains of sites in three-dimensions.  Magnetometry can produce images denoting differences on the composition of those materials, both anthropogenic and natural, but with more limited three-dimensional resolution. The integration of the two has a unique ability to resolve and interpret these buried materials, differentiated between the human-caused and natural layers, and place all buried features within historic landscapes.  The final product of geophysical integration, along with some limited subsurface testing, produces a holistic analysis of human adaptations to, and modifications of, the ancient landscape. Examples are shown from sites in Roman Croatia and Britain, Medieval Ireland, Colonial Connecticut, and an Archaic site in the Colorado Rocky Mountains.  These examples from very different environments, time periods and cultural groups illustrate how the integrated geophysical methodology can interpret, on a scale approaching many hectares, the ancient landscapes within which people lived. 410 0$aSpringerBriefs in Geography,$x2211-4165 606 $aGeophysics 606 $aArchaeology 606 $aGeology 606 $aAnthropology 606 $aGeophysics/Geodesy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/G18009 606 $aArchaeology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X13000 606 $aGeology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/G17002 606 $aAnthropology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X12000 615 0$aGeophysics. 615 0$aArchaeology. 615 0$aGeology. 615 0$aAnthropology. 615 14$aGeophysics/Geodesy. 615 24$aArchaeology. 615 24$aGeology. 615 24$aAnthropology. 676 $a621.38485 700 $aConyers$b Lawrence B$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0462228 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910299403003321 996 $aGround-penetrating Radar and Magnetometry for Buried Landscape Analysis$92512576 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02660nam 2200541Ia 450 001 9910741193203321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-4471-5037-6 024 7 $a10.1007/978-1-4471-5037-4 035 $a(OCoLC)834525461 035 $a(MiFhGG)GVRL6XRX 035 $a(CKB)2550000001043151 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1205277 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001043151 100 $a20130215d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurun|---uuuua 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aModeling and simulating command and control $efor organizations under extreme situations /$fIl-Chul Moon, Kathleen M. Carley, Tag Gon Kim 205 $a1st ed. 2013. 210 $aNew York $cSpringer$d2013 215 $a1 online resource (ix, 87 pages) $cillustrations (some color), color maps 225 1 $aSpringerBriefs in computer science 300 $a"ISSN: 2191-5768." 311 $a1-4471-5036-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aIntroduction -- Modeling and Simulating Command and Control for Terrorist Organization -- Modeling and Simulating Command and Control for Naval Air Defense Operation -- Modeling and Simulating Command and Control for Disaster Response. 330 $aCommanding and controlling organizations in extreme situations is a challenging task in military, intelligence, and disaster management. Such command and control must be quick, effective, and considerate when dealing with the changing, complex, and risky conditions of the situation. To enable optimal command and control under extremes, robust structures and efficient operations are required of organizations. This work discusses how to design and conduct virtual experiments on resilient organizational structures and operational practices using modeling and simulation. The work illustrates key aspects of robustly networked organizations and modeled performance of human decision-makers through examples of naval-air defense, counterterrorism operations, and disaster responses. 410 0$aSpringerBriefs in computer science. 606 $aComputer simulation 606 $aCrisis management 606 $aEmergency management 615 0$aComputer simulation. 615 0$aCrisis management. 615 0$aEmergency management. 676 $a006.696 701 $aCarley$b Kathleen M$01681736 701 $aKim$b Tag Gon$0771460 701 $aMoon$b Il-Chul$01424093 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910741193203321 996 $aModeling and simulating command and control$94184756 997 $aUNINA