LEADER 00856nam0-2200301---450- 001 990009431300403321 005 20110923112248.0 010 $a0896401375 035 $a000943130 035 $aFED01000943130 035 $a(Aleph)000943130FED01 035 $a000943130 100 $a20110923d1988----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aeng 102 $aUS 105 $aa-------001yy 200 1 $aDiagnostic electron microscopy$ea text atlas$fby G. Richard Dickersin 210 $aNew York ; Tokyo$cIgaku-Shoin$dc1988 215 $aXVIII, 615 p.$cill.$d29 cm 610 0 $aMicroscopia elettronica 700 1$aDickersin,$bG. Richard$0512791 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990009431300403321 952 $a56 D 33$b1756$fDMVAP 959 $aDMVAP 996 $aDiagnostic electron microscopy$9759599 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03930nam 22006375 450 001 9910299403003321 005 20200703104925.0 010 $a3-319-70890-2 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-70890-4 035 $a(CKB)4340000000223562 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-70890-4 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5161687 035 $z(PPN)258863331 035 $a(PPN)221252932 035 $a(EXLCZ)994340000000223562 100 $a20171124d2018 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn|008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aGround-penetrating Radar and Magnetometry for Buried Landscape Analysis /$fby Lawrence B. Conyers 205 $a1st ed. 2018. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2018. 215 $a1 online resource (XII, 109 p. 68 illus., 66 illus. in color.) 225 1 $aSpringerBriefs in Geography,$x2211-4165 311 $a3-319-70889-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters. 327 $aChapter 1 -- Introduction -- Chapter 2 -- Ground-penetrating Radar -- Chapter 3 -- Magnetometry -- Chapter 4 -- Small Roman Site in Croatia -- Chapter 5 -- Roman Temple in England -- Chapter 6 -- Early Colonial Site in Connecticut -- Chapter 7 -- Medieval site in Ireland -- Chapter 8 -- Hunter-gatherer Site in Colorado -- Chapter 9 -- Conclusions -- References. 330 $aThis book presents the integrated use of magnetometry and ground-penetrating radar geophysical mapping to understand the human presence within buried archaeological landscapes. Ground-penetrating radar can be used to identify buried living surfaces, geological stratigraphy and the architectural remains of sites in three-dimensions.  Magnetometry can produce images denoting differences on the composition of those materials, both anthropogenic and natural, but with more limited three-dimensional resolution. The integration of the two has a unique ability to resolve and interpret these buried materials, differentiated between the human-caused and natural layers, and place all buried features within historic landscapes.  The final product of geophysical integration, along with some limited subsurface testing, produces a holistic analysis of human adaptations to, and modifications of, the ancient landscape. Examples are shown from sites in Roman Croatia and Britain, Medieval Ireland, Colonial Connecticut, and an Archaic site in the Colorado Rocky Mountains.  These examples from very different environments, time periods and cultural groups illustrate how the integrated geophysical methodology can interpret, on a scale approaching many hectares, the ancient landscapes within which people lived. 410 0$aSpringerBriefs in Geography,$x2211-4165 606 $aGeophysics 606 $aArchaeology 606 $aGeology 606 $aAnthropology 606 $aGeophysics/Geodesy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/G18009 606 $aArchaeology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X13000 606 $aGeology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/G17002 606 $aAnthropology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X12000 615 0$aGeophysics. 615 0$aArchaeology. 615 0$aGeology. 615 0$aAnthropology. 615 14$aGeophysics/Geodesy. 615 24$aArchaeology. 615 24$aGeology. 615 24$aAnthropology. 676 $a621.38485 700 $aConyers$b Lawrence B$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0462228 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910299403003321 996 $aGround-penetrating Radar and Magnetometry for Buried Landscape Analysis$92512576 997 $aUNINA