LEADER 00704nam 2200229 450 001 9910593801203321 005 20220929105624.0 100 $a20220929d1967----u y0engy50 ba 101 0 $ager 102 $aDE 105 0 $a 00 200 1 $aVerantwortung im Wandel der Zeit$eEinübung in geistiges Handeln. Jaspers, Buber, C. F. v. Weizsäcker, Guardini, Heidegger$fRichard Wisser 210 $aMainz$cHase & Koehler$d1967 215 $a325 p.$d8° 700 1$aWisser,$bRichard$0160420 801 2$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a9910593801203321 952 $aXI I 60$b85559$fFGBC 959 $aFGBC 996 $aVerantwortung im Wandel der Zeit$92914483 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03267nam 2200577 450 001 9910297045603321 005 20200613172230.0 010 $a3-8452-9311-X 035 $a(CKB)4100000006937317 035 $a(WaSeSS)IndRDA00124354 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/46190 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000006937317 100 $a20200613d2018 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aEli Lilly and beyond $ethe role of international intellectual property treaties in establishing legitimate expectations in investor-state dispute settlement /$fIvan Stepanov 205 $aFirst edition. 210 $cNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG$d2018 210 1$aBaden-Baden, Germany :$cNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH,$d2018. 215 $a1 online resource (84 pages) 225 1 $aMIPLC Studies ;$vVolume 33 311 $a3-8487-5109-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $gIntroduction --$tInternational legal framework --$tEli Lilly volume Canada : facts and proceedings --$t"Promise utility doctrine" --$tFair and equitable treatment standard and legitimate expectations --$tLegitimate expectations, intellectual property rights and international property law framework : Eli Lilly and beyond --$tIs conformity with international intellectual property norms enough? --$gConclusions. 330 $aThrough the emergence of several high-profile investment arbitration cases, the effects of IPRs as investments covered under IIAs have finally come to light. The latest award, the only arbitration case dealing with patents as IPRs ? the Eli Lilly v. Canada case ? has brought up a number of interesting questions. Two of Eli Lilly's patents have been revoked, whereupon the company tried to redeem them through investment arbitration. One of the claims put forward by Eli Lilly is that his legitimate expectations, a standard of protection found in international investment law, have been frustrated by Canada. By allegedly failing to observe its obligations contained in Chapter 17 of the NAFTA, Canada frustrated the legitimate expectations of Eli Lilly. The thesis tries to analyze how the relationship between international IP treaties and legitimate expectations functions. 410 0$aMIPLC studies ;$vVolume 33. 606 $aIntellectual property (International law) 610 $aEstablishing Legitimate Expectations 610 $aexpropriation 610 $aEli Lilly 610 $aBeyond 610 $ainvestment law 610 $aRole of International Intellectual Property Treaties 610 $alegitimate expectations 610 $aInvestor-State Dispute Settlement 610 $aIntellectual property 610 $apatents 610 $ainternational economic law 610 $aalternative dispute resolution 615 0$aIntellectual property (International law) 676 $a341.758 700 $aStepanov$b Ivan$c(Writer on intellectual property),$0936211 801 0$bWaSeSS 801 1$bWaSeSS 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910297045603321 996 $aEli Lilly and beyond$92109059 997 $aUNINA