LEADER 03246oam 2200493I 450 001 9910296448403321 005 20240219170552.0 010 $a0-262-34820-9 035 $a(CKB)4100000007213068 035 $a(CaBNVSL)mat08544147 035 $a(IDAMS)0b000064888833cb 035 $a(IEEE)8544147 035 $a(OCoLC)1062397891 035 $a(OCoLC-P)1062397891 035 $a(MaCbMITP)11250 035 $a(PPN)255245378 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000007213068 100 $a20181112d2018 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n||||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2isbdmedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe problem with software $ewhy smart engineers write bad code /$fby Adam Barr 210 1$aCambridge :$cThe MIT Press,$d2018 215 $a1 PDF (320 pages) 225 1 $aThe MIT Press 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 330 $aAn industry insider explains why there is so much bad software - and why academia doesn't teach programmers what industry wants them to know. Why is software so prone to bugs? So vulnerable to viruses? Why are software products so often delayed, or even canceled? Is software development really hard, or are software developers just not that good at it? In The Problem with Software , Adam Barr examines the proliferation of bad software, explains what causes it, and offers some suggestions on how to improve the situation. For one thing, Barr points out, academia doesn't teach programmers what they actually need to know to do their jobs: how to work in a team to create code that works reliably and can be maintained by somebody other than the original authors. As the size and complexity of commercial software have grown, the gap between academic computer science and industry has widened. It's an open secret that there is little engineering in software engineering, which continues to rely not on codified scientific knowledge but on intuition and experience. Barr, who worked as a programmer for more than twenty years, describes how the industry has evolved, from the era of mainframes and Fortran to today's embrace of the cloud. He explains bugs and why software has so many of them, and why today's interconnected computers offer fertile ground for viruses and worms. The difference between good and bad software can be a single line of code, and Barr includes code to illustrate the consequences of seemingly inconsequential choices by programmers. Looking to the future, Barr writes that the best prospect for improving software engineering is the move to the cloud. When software is a service and not a product, companies will have more incentive to make it good rather than "good enough to ship." 410 0$aThe MIT Press 606 $aComputer software$xDevelopment$vAnecdotes 606 $aComputer programmers$vAnecdotes 608 $aAnecdotes.$2fast 610 $aCOMPUTER SCIENCE/General 615 0$aComputer software$xDevelopment 615 0$aComputer programmers 676 $a005.3 700 $aBarr$b Adam$01208383 801 0$bOCoLC-P 801 1$bOCoLC-P 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910296448403321 996 $aThe problem with software$92787635 997 $aUNINA