LEADER 04275 am 22006613u 450 001 9910293145003321 005 20200630014341.0 010 $a3-319-78160-X 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-78160-0 035 $a(CKB)4100000003359575 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-78160-0 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5372088 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5372088 035 $a(OCoLC)1078955961 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000003359575 100 $a20180425d2018 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn#008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aDeliberative Public Engagement with Science$b[electronic resource] $eAn Empirical Investigation /$fby Lisa M. PytlikZillig, Myiah J. Hutchens, Peter Muhlberger, Frank J. Gonzalez, Alan J. Tomkins 205 $a1st ed. 2018. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2018. 215 $a1 online resource (XI, 129 p. 12 illus., 4 illus. in color.) 225 1 $aSpringerBriefs in Psychology,$x2192-8363 311 $a3-319-78159-6 327 $aChapter 1: The Big Picture -- Chapter 2: Specific Methods -- Chapter 3: Knowledge -- Chapter 4: Attitude Change and Polarization -- Chapter 5: Policy Acceptance -- Chapter 6: Conclusion and Future Directions. 330 $aThis compact open access reference delves beyond popular concepts of educated consumers and an informed public by examining the science behind deliberative engagement. Using data from four longitudinal studies, the authors assess public engagement methods in deliberative discussions of ethical, legal, and social issues concerning innovations in nanotechnology. Coverage includes the theoretical origins of the studies, forms of engagement and variations used, and in-depth details on cognitive, affective, and social components that go into the critical thinking process and forming of opinions. Not only are the findings intriguing in and of themselves, but researchers from varied fields will also find them useful in pursuing their own projects. Featured in the coverage: Experimental methods and measures used in relation to specific outcomes. Forms of deliberative engagement affecting objective and subjective knowledge. Effects of engagement variables on attitude formation, change, and polarization. Tracing the processes leading to policy acceptance and support. Study conclusions and evaluation. Plus supplemental materials giving readers access to full study data. Since public engagement methods are widely regarded as valuable for policy input, planning purposes, and understanding societal processes, Deliberative Engagement with Science stands to have a wide audience among psychologists, researchers, academics, and policymakers, as well as professionals in the corporate sphere and the tech industries. 410 0$aSpringerBriefs in Psychology,$x2192-8363 606 $aPersonality 606 $aSocial psychology 606 $aPublic policy 606 $aNanotechnology 606 $aPersonality and Social Psychology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/Y20050 606 $aPublic Policy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911060 606 $aNanotechnology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/Z14000 615 0$aPersonality. 615 0$aSocial psychology. 615 0$aPublic policy. 615 0$aNanotechnology. 615 14$aPersonality and Social Psychology. 615 24$aPublic Policy. 615 24$aNanotechnology. 676 $a155.2 676 $a302 700 $aPytlikZillig$b Lisa M$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0960012 702 $aHutchens$b Myiah J$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 702 $aMuhlberger$b Peter$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 702 $aGonzalez$b Frank J$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 702 $aTomkins$b Alan J$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910293145003321 996 $aDeliberative Public Engagement with Science$92175845 997 $aUNINA