LEADER 03003oam 22005414a 450 001 9910272342103321 005 20231215151817.0 010 $a90-485-3714-2 024 7 $a10.1515/9789048537143 035 $a(CKB)4100000004244631 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5521577 035 $a(DE-B1597)513246 035 $a(OCoLC)1055045782 035 $a(DE-B1597)9789048537143 035 $a(OCoLC)1112364090 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse76576 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/30891 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000004244631 100 $a20190816d2019 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aAnalogy and exemplary reasoning in legal discourse /$fedited by Hendrik Kaptein and Bastiaan van der Velden 210 $cAmsterdam University Press$d2018 210 1$aAmsterdam :$cAmsterdam University Press,$d[2017] 210 4$dİ2017 215 $a1 online resource (197 pages) 311 0 $a94-6298-590-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 177-187) and index. 327 $aIntroduction -- Imitation and analogy / Amalia Amaya -- Indefeasible analogical argument / Scott Brewer -- Is analogy a form of legal reasoning? / Bartosz Broz?ek -- Analogical reasoning and extensive interpretation / Damiano Canale and Giovanni Tuzet -- Analogy and balancing : the partial reducibility thesis and its problems / David Duarte -- Analogy and balancing : a reply to David Duarte / Bartosz Broz?ek -- Analogy and balancing once again : a reply to Bartosz Broz?ek / David Duarte -- Argument by analogy in the law / Martin Golding -- Undoing damage by analogy : as if (almost) nothing happened, with notes on the meaning of everything / Hendrik Kaptein -- Analogy in the strict liability rules in the Dutch civil code / Bastiaan van der Velden. 330 $aThis book brings together contributions from leading figures in legal studies on analogy and related forms of reasoning in the law. Analogical reasoning-which relies on the concept of two different things being in some way like each other-is hugely important not just in the practice of law, but it is nonetheless strongly contested. This volume raises key questions like: What is the logical, argumentative, rhetorical, or just heuristic force of analogy in law? Is analogy really different from extensive interpretation, reasoning by precedent and appeal to paradigm? 606 $aLaw$xMethodology 606 $aAnalogy 610 $aLegal analogy, exemplary reasoning. 615 0$aLaw$xMethodology. 615 0$aAnalogy. 676 $a340/.1 700 $aKaptein$b Hendrik$4edt 702 $aKaptein$b Hendrik 702 $aVelden$b Bastiaan D. van der 801 0$bMdBmJHUP 801 1$bMdBmJHUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910272342103321 996 $aAnalogy and Exemplary Reasoning in Legal Discourse$92127843 997 $aUNINA