LEADER 04296nam 2200745 450 001 9910260604103321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-282-89929-5 010 $a9786612899294 010 $a0-262-28971-7 035 $a(CKB)2560000000054314 035 $a(CaBNVSL)mat06267481 035 $a(IDAMS)0b000064818b44d3 035 $a(IEEE)6267481 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000437258 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11274848 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000437258 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10431432 035 $a(PQKB)11779250 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3339183 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3339183 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10433726 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL289929 035 $a(OCoLC)699490862 035 $a(EXLCZ)992560000000054314 100 $a20151223d2012 uy 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n||||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2isbdmedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aGood faith collaboration $ethe culture of Wikipedia /$fJoseph Michael Reagle, Jr. ; foreword by Lawrence Lessig 210 1$aCambridge, Massachusetts :$cMIT Press,$dc2010. 210 2$a[Piscataqay, New Jersey] :$cIEEE Xplore,$d[2012] 215 $a1 PDF (xv, 244 pages) 225 1 $aHistory and foundations of information science 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a0-262-51820-1 311 $a0-262-01447-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 330 $aWikipedia, the online encyclopedia, is built by a community - a community of Wikipedians who are expected to "assume good faith" when interacting with one another. In Good Faith Collaboration, Joseph Reagle examines this unique collaborative culture. 330 $aWikipedia, says Reagle, is not the first effort to create a freely shared, universal encyclopedia; its early twentieth-century ancestors include Paul Otlet's Universal Repository and H.G. Wells's proposal for a World Brain. Both these projects, like Wikipedia, were fuelled by new technology-which at the time included index cards and microfilm. What distinguishes Wikipedia from these and other more recent ventures is Wikipedia's good faith collaborative culture, as seen not only in the writing and editing of articles but also in their discussion pages and edit histories. Keeping an open perspective on both knowledge claims and other contributors, Reagle argues, creates an extraordinary collaborative potential. 330 $aWikipedia is famously an encyclopedia "anyone can edit," and Reagle examines Wikipedia's openness and several challenges to it: technical features that limit vandalism to articles; private actions to mitigate potential legal problems; and Wikipedia's own internal bureaucratization. He explores Wikipedia's process of consensus (reviewing a dispute over naming articles on television shows) and examines the way leadership and authority work in an open content community. 330 $aWikipedia's style of collaborative production has been imitated, analyzed, and satirized. Despite the social unease over its implications for individual autonomy, institutional authority, and the character (and quality) of cultural products, Wikipedia's good faith collaborative culture has brought us closer than ever to a realization of the century-old pursuit of a universal encyclopedia."--Jacket. 410 0$aHistory and foundations of information science 606 $aElectronic encyclopedias$vCase studies 606 $aWikis (Computer science)$vCase studies 606 $aCommunication in learning and scholarship$xTechnological innovations$vCase studies 606 $aAuthorship$xCollaboration$vCase studies 606 $aOnline social networks$vCase studies 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aElectronic encyclopedias 615 0$aWikis (Computer science) 615 0$aCommunication in learning and scholarship$xTechnological innovations 615 0$aAuthorship$xCollaboration 615 0$aOnline social networks 676 $a030 700 $aReagle$b Joseph Michael$0849899 801 0$bCaBNVSL 801 1$bCaBNVSL 801 2$bCaBNVSL 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910260604103321 996 $aGood faith collaboration$92465197 997 $aUNINA