LEADER 03972nam 22006375 450 001 9910255310803321 005 20200629201518.0 010 $a3-319-28715-X 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-28715-7 035 $a(CKB)3710000000667122 035 $a(EBL)4526301 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-28715-7 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4526301 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000667122 100 $a20160504d2016 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aFraming Foreign Policy in India, Brazil and South Africa$b[electronic resource] $eOn the Like-Mindedness of the IBSA States /$fby Jörg Husar 205 $a1st ed. 2016. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2016. 215 $a1 online resource (273 p.) 225 1 $aContributions to Political Science,$x2198-7289 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a3-319-28714-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters. 327 $aIntroduction -- IBSA: Three Like-Minded States?- A Comparative Approach to Foreign Policy Discourse Analysis -- Schools of Thought in Foreign Policy Discourse: the Potential for Convergence and Divergence Amongst IBSA States -- Official Framings of Foreign Policy: South-South Leadership as Starting Point of the IBSA Initiative -- Contested Roles: Investigating Societal Framings of Foreign Policy in India, Brazil and South Africa -- Conclusions: On the Like-Mindedness of the IBSA States -- Outlook: IBSA and the Shadow of BRICS -- Annex. 330 $a

This book analyses the India, Brazil, South Africa Dialogue Forum (IBSA), focusing on the communalities and differences in the way foreign policy is conceptualized in its member states. Utilizing 83 interviews with foreign policy makers and experts, as well as the analysis of 119 foreign-policy speeches, the author traces key shifts in official foreign policy discourse. In order to evaluate the degree of support for key IBSA Dialogue Forum concepts within national discourse, the author also examines the interplay between official and broader societal discourses on foreign policy. This analysis combines political science factors (foreign policy role conceptions) with linguistic factors, thus enabling a qualitative and quantitative comparison of different framings of foreign policy. Extensive empirical material collected during six months of field research in India, Brazil and South Africa allows the author to present a differentiated account of their alleged like-mindedness.

. 410 0$aContributions to Political Science,$x2198-7289 606 $aInternational relations 606 $aPolitical communication 606 $aComparative politics 606 $aSociology 606 $aInternational Relations$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/912000 606 $aPolitical Communication$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911030 606 $aComparative Politics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911040 606 $aKnowledge - Discourse$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X22120 615 0$aInternational relations. 615 0$aPolitical communication. 615 0$aComparative politics. 615 0$aSociology. 615 14$aInternational Relations. 615 24$aPolitical Communication. 615 24$aComparative Politics. 615 24$aKnowledge - Discourse. 676 $a327.54 700 $aHusar$b Jörg$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0788851 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910255310803321 996 $aFraming foreign policy in India, Brazil and South Africa$91758845 997 $aUNINA