LEADER 04619nam 22007935 450 001 9910255277703321 005 20230810191248.0 010 $a3-319-54060-2 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-54060-3 035 $a(CKB)3710000001151948 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-54060-3 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4837606 035 $a(PPN)222234989 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000001151948 100 $a20170406d2017 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn#008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 13$aAn International Perspective on Design Protection of Visible Spare Parts /$fby Dana Beldiman, Constantin Blanke-Roeser 205 $a1st ed. 2017. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2017. 215 $a1 online resource (XV, 132 p.) 225 1 $aSpringerBriefs in Law,$x2192-8568 311 $a3-319-54059-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters. 327 $a1. Introduction -- 2. Business Aspects of the Spare Parts Industry -- 3. Design Protection Relating to Component Parts of Complex Products (Spare Parts) in the EU and the U.S. -- 4. Legislative Efforts Relating to Design Law in the Context of Spare Parts -- 5 Jurisprudence Relating to Design Law in the Context of Spare Parts -- 6. Considerations Towards a Compromise -- 7. Future Outlook: The Spare Parts Debate in the Era of 3D Printing -- 8. Conclusion. . 330 $aThis publication examines the legal aspects of the spare parts market from an IP perspective: specifically whether design protection for spare parts of a complex product extends to the spare part aftermarket, or whether that market should remain open to competition. The stakeholders? equally weighty arguments that must be balanced against are, on the one hand, the property interest in an earned IP right in the design of the part; and on the other, enhanced competition, likely reflected in lower prices. The mounting tension between these two positions is manifest an increased number of lawsuits in both the US and the EU. This book provides a discussion of the legal issues involved in this debate from a global perspective, with special focus on the EU and the US. Part I contextualizes the legal debate by discussing the historical background, the competitive situation and the respective stakeholder positions. Part II examines the relevant legal questions on a comparative basis, evaluating the likelihood of its adoption in the jurisdictions examined. Concluding that adoption is unlikely, Part III proposes a number of possible considerations meant to further compromise. Part IV concludes with a future outlook, specifically in light of the impact of technological development on this market. 410 0$aSpringerBriefs in Law,$x2192-8568 606 $aInformation technology$xLaw and legislation 606 $aMass media$xLaw and legislation 606 $aIndustrial design 606 $aAutomobile industry and trade 606 $aPrivate international law 606 $aConflict of laws 606 $aInternational law 606 $aComparative law 606 $aLaw$xEurope 606 $aTrade regulation 606 $aIT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property 606 $aIndustrial Design 606 $aAutomotive Industry 606 $aPrivate International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law 606 $aEuropean Law 606 $aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law 615 0$aInformation technology$xLaw and legislation. 615 0$aMass media$xLaw and legislation. 615 0$aIndustrial design. 615 0$aAutomobile industry and trade. 615 0$aPrivate international law. 615 0$aConflict of laws. 615 0$aInternational law. 615 0$aComparative law. 615 0$aLaw$xEurope. 615 0$aTrade regulation. 615 14$aIT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property. 615 24$aIndustrial Design. 615 24$aAutomotive Industry. 615 24$aPrivate International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law. 615 24$aEuropean Law. 615 24$aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law. 676 $a343.099 700 $aBeldiman$b Dana$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0940312 702 $aBlanke-Roeser$b Constantin$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910255277703321 996 $aAn International Perspective on Design Protection of Visible Spare Parts$92120381 997 $aUNINA