LEADER 03629nam 22005175 450 001 9910255265103321 005 20200629201700.0 010 $a1-137-55405-3 024 7 $a10.1057/978-1-137-55405-5 035 $a(CKB)3710000001127603 035 $a(DE-He213)978-1-137-55405-5 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6314514 035 $a(PPN)248605127 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000001127603 100 $a20170307d2017 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn|008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aMapping Paths to Family Justice $eResolving Family Disputes in Neoliberal Times /$fby Anne Barlow, Rosemary Hunter, Janet Smithson, Jan Ewing 205 $a1st ed. 2017. 210 1$aLondon :$cPalgrave Macmillan UK :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2017. 215 $a1 online resource (XIV, 240 p. 4 illus.) 225 1 $aPalgrave Socio-Legal Studies 311 $a1-137-55404-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 217-228) and index. 327 $aIntroduction -- 1. The three FDRs -- 2. The research project -- 3. Awareness of FDRs ? the policy challenge -- 4. Entering family dispute resolution -- 5. Experiences of FDRs -- 6. Outcomes of FDRs -- 7. ?Just? settlements? -- Conclusion -- Appendix 1: Summary of project information available on UK Data Service -- Appendix 2: Summary of TNS-BMRB omnibus survey methodology. 330 $aThe family justice system in England and Wales has undergone radical change over the past 20 years. A significant part of this shifting landscape has been an increasing emphasis on settling private family disputes out of court, which has been embraced by policy-makers, judges and practitioners alike and is promoted as an unqualified good. Mapping Paths to Family Justice: Resolving Family Disputes in Neoliberal Times examines the experiences of people taking part in out-of-court family dispute resolution in England and Wales. It addresses questions such as how participants? experiences match up to the ideal; how recent changes to the legal system have affected people?s ability to access out-of-court dispute resolution; and what kind of outcomes are achieved in family dispute resolution. This book is the first study systematically to compare different forms of family dispute resolution. It explores people?s experiences of solicitor negotiations, mediation and collaborative law empirically by analyzing findings from a nationally representative survey, individual in-depth interviews with parties and practitioners, and recorded family dispute resolution processes. It considers these in the context of ongoing neoliberal reforms to the family justice system, drawing out conclusions and implications for policy and practice. . 410 0$aPalgrave Socio-Legal Studies 606 $aLaw and the social sciences 606 $aSocio-legal Studies$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/1BB000 615 0$aLaw and the social sciences. 615 14$aSocio-legal Studies. 676 $a346.42015 700 $aBarlow$b Anne$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0999695 702 $aHunter$b Rosemary$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 702 $aSmithson$b Janet$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 702 $aEwing$b Jan$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910255265103321 996 $aMapping Paths to Family Justice$92294820 997 $aUNINA