LEADER 04027nam 22007575 450 001 9910255245103321 005 20200629221033.0 010 $a1-137-56657-4 024 7 $a10.1007/978-1-137-56657-7 035 $a(CKB)3710000000636103 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001647630 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16414911 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001647630 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)13405731 035 $a(PQKB)11267559 035 $a(DE-He213)978-1-137-56657-7 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4716242 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000636103 100 $a20160318d2016 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn|008mamaa 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aLucretius and Modernity$b[electronic resource] $eEpicurean Encounters Across Time and Disciplines /$fedited by Jacques Lezra, Liza Blake 205 $a1st ed. 2016. 210 1$aNew York :$cPalgrave Macmillan US :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2016. 215 $a1 online resource (VII, 225 p.) 225 1 $aThe New Antiquity 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a1-137-59189-7 311 $a1-137-58199-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 330 $aLucretius's long shadow falls across the disciplines of literary history and criticism, philosophy, religious studies, classics, political philosophy, and the history of science. The best recent example is Stephen Greenblatt's popular account of the Roman poet's De Rerum Natura (On the Nature of Things) rediscovery by Poggio Bracciolini, and of its reception in early modernity, winner of both a Pulitzer Prize and National Book Award. Despite the poem's newfound influence and visibility, very little cross-disciplinary conversation has taken place. This edited collection brings together essays by distinguished scholars to examine the relationship between Lucretius and modernity. Key questions weave this book's ideas and arguments together: What is the relation between literary form and philosophical argument? How does the text of De rerum natura allow itself to be used, at different historical moments and to different ends? What counts as reason for Lucretius? Together, these essays present a nuanced, skeptical, passionate, historically sensitive, and complicated account of what is at stake when we claim Lucretius for modernity. 410 0$aThe New Antiquity 606 $aLiterature?Philosophy 606 $aCulture?Study and teaching 606 $aEuropean literature 606 $aPhilology 606 $aClassical literature 606 $aPoetry 606 $aLiterary Theory$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/812000 606 $aCultural Theory$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/411130 606 $aEuropean Literature$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/832000 606 $aClassical Studies$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/728000 606 $aClassical and Antique Literature$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/816000 606 $aPoetry and Poetics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/824000 615 0$aLiterature?Philosophy. 615 0$aCulture?Study and teaching. 615 0$aEuropean literature. 615 0$aPhilology. 615 0$aClassical literature. 615 0$aPoetry. 615 14$aLiterary Theory. 615 24$aCultural Theory. 615 24$aEuropean Literature. 615 24$aClassical Studies. 615 24$aClassical and Antique Literature. 615 24$aPoetry and Poetics. 676 $a187 702 $aLezra$b Jacques$4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 702 $aBlake$b Liza$4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910255245103321 996 $aLucretius and Modernity$92525064 997 $aUNINA