LEADER 03636nam 22005655 450 001 9910255218103321 005 20200630011431.0 010 $a3-319-56400-5 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-56400-5 035 $a(CKB)3710000001178419 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-56400-5 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4848069 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000001178419 100 $a20170425d2017 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn|008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 12$aA Revised Consent Model for the Transplantation of Face and Upper Limbs: Covenant Consent$b[electronic resource] /$fby James L. Benedict 205 $a1st ed. 2017. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2017. 215 $a1 online resource (IX, 256 p.) 225 1 $aInternational Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine,$x1567-8008 ;$v73 311 $a3-319-56399-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aIntroduction -- Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation -- The Ethics of Consent -- The Meaning of Covenant -- Covenant Consent -- Conclusion. 330 $aThis book supports the emerging field of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) for face and upper-limb transplants by providing a revised, ethically appropriate consent model which takes into account what is actually required of facial and upper extremity transplant recipients. In place of consent as permission-giving, waiver, or autonomous authorization (the standard approaches), this book imagines consent as an ongoing mutual commitment, i.e. as covenant consent. The covenant consent model highlights the need for a durable personal relationship between the patient/subject and the care provider/researcher. Such a relationship is crucial given the recovery period of 5 years or more for VCA recipients. The case for covenant consent is made by first examining the field of vascularized composite allotransplantation, the history and present understandings of consent in health care, and the history and use of the covenant concept from its origins through its applications to health care ethics today. This book explains how standard approaches to consent are inadequate in light of the particular features of facial and upper limb transplantation. In contrast, use of the covenant concept creates a consent model that is more appropriate ethically for these very complex surgeries and long-term recoveries. 410 0$aInternational Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine,$x1567-8008 ;$v73 606 $aBioethics 606 $aSurgical transplantation 606 $aHealth?Religious aspects 606 $aBioethics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E14010 606 $aTransplant Surgery$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/H59117 606 $aReligion and Health$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/1A8010 615 0$aBioethics. 615 0$aSurgical transplantation. 615 0$aHealth?Religious aspects. 615 14$aBioethics. 615 24$aTransplant Surgery. 615 24$aReligion and Health. 676 $a617.52059 700 $aBenedict$b James L$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0903156 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910255218103321 996 $aA Revised Consent Model for the Transplantation of Face and Upper Limbs: Covenant Consent$92018941 997 $aUNINA