LEADER 03761nam 22006015 450 001 9910255212903321 005 20200704170837.0 010 $a3-319-57093-5 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-57093-8 035 $a(CKB)3710000001632873 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4947024 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-57093-8 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000001632873 100 $a20170812d2017 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aPhilosophizing Madness from Nietzsche to Derrida$b[electronic resource] /$fby Angelos Evangelou 205 $a1st ed. 2017. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2017. 215 $a1 online resource (277 pages) $cillustrations 311 $a3-319-57092-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aChapter 1: The ?Nietzsche Event?: Madness and the Limits of Becoming -- Chapter 2: Georges Bataille: Madness and the ?Ethics of Vulnerability? -- Chapter 3: Michel Foucault: Madness and Philosophical Incapacity -- Chapter 4: Jacques Derrida: Philosophy Opens Up to Madness -- Conclusion: Responding to Madness: ?Autobiographical Philosophy?. 330 $aDrawing connections between madness, philosophy and autobiography, this book addresses the question of how Nietzsche's madness might have affected his later works. It also explores why continental philosophy after Nietzsche is so fascinated with madness, and how it (re)considers, (re)evaluates and (re)valorizes madness. To answer these questions, the book analyzes the work of three major figures in twentieth-century French philosophy who were significantly influenced by Nietzsche: Bataille, Foucault and Derrida, examining the ways in which their responses to Nietzsche?s madness determine how they understand philosophy as well as philosophy?s relation to madness. For these philosophers, posing the question about madness renders the philosophical subject vulnerable and implicates it in a state of responsibility towards that about which it asks. Out of this analysis of their engagement with the question of madness emerges a new conception of 'autobiographical philosophy', which entails the insertion of this vulnerable subject into the philosophical work, to which each of these philosophers adheres or resists in different ways. 606 $aExistentialism 606 $aModern philosophy 606 $aPhilosophy of mind 606 $aPhilosophy 606 $aSocial sciences?Philosophy 606 $aExistentialism$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E44020 606 $aModern Philosophy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E19000 606 $aPhilosophy of Mind$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E31000 606 $aPhilosophy of Man$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E28000 606 $aSocial Philosophy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E43000 615 0$aExistentialism. 615 0$aModern philosophy. 615 0$aPhilosophy of mind. 615 0$aPhilosophy. 615 0$aSocial sciences?Philosophy. 615 14$aExistentialism. 615 24$aModern Philosophy. 615 24$aPhilosophy of Mind. 615 24$aPhilosophy of Man. 615 24$aSocial Philosophy. 676 $a616.89001 700 $aEvangelou$b Angelos$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0989037 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910255212903321 996 $aPhilosophizing Madness from Nietzsche to Derrida$92261678 997 $aUNINA