LEADER 03537nam  22006015  450 
001 9910255199403321
005 20200704092619.0
010   $a3-319-28206-9
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-28206-0
035   $a(CKB)3710000000616290
035   $a(EBL)4442122
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-28206-0
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4442122
035   $a(PPN)228320976
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000616290
100   $a20160308d2016      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 14$aThe Competence of the European Union in Copyright Lawmaking $eA Normative Perspective of EU Powers for Copyright Harmonization /$fby Ana Ramalho
205   $a1st ed. 2016.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2016.
215   $a1 online resource (257 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a3-319-28205-0 
327   $a1. Introduction -- 2. A Normative Gap in Copyright Lawmaking? -- 3. Colonizing the Normative Gap: The Intervention of the Court of Justice -- 4. Minding the Normative Gap: The EU Treaties -- 5. Bridging the Normative Gap: Proposed Benchmarks for Copyright Lawmaking -- 6. Field-Testing the Normative Bridge: The EU Copyright Acquis -- 7. The Normative Gap: Water Under the Bridge.
330   $aThis book inquires into the competence of the EU to legislate in the field of copyright, and uses content analysis techniques to demonstrate the existence of a normative gap in copyright lawmaking. To address that gap, it proposes the creation of benchmarks of legislative activity, reasoning that EU secondary legislation, such as directives and regulations, should be based on higher sources of law. It investigates two such possible sources: the activity of the EU Court of Justice in the pre-legislative era and the EU treaties. From these sources, the author establishes concrete benchmarks of legislative activity, which she then tests by applying them to current EU copyright legislation. This provides examples of good and bad practices in copyright lawmaking and also shows how the benchmarks could be implemented in copyright legislation. Finally, the author offers some recommendations in this regard.
606   $aMass media
606   $aLaw
606   $aLaw?Europe
606   $aEuropean Economic Community literature
606   $aEuropean Union
606   $aIT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R15009
606   $aEuropean Law$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R20000
606   $aEuropean Integration$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/W33010
606   $aEuropean Union Politics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911140
615  0$aMass media.
615  0$aLaw.
615  0$aLaw?Europe.
615  0$aEuropean Economic Community literature.
615  0$aEuropean Union.
615 14$aIT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property.
615 24$aEuropean Law.
615 24$aEuropean Integration.
615 24$aEuropean Union Politics.
676   $a340
700   $aRamalho$b Ana$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01059508
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910255199403321
996   $aThe Competence of the European Union in Copyright Lawmaking$92506734
997   $aUNINA