LEADER 04271nam 22006735 450 001 9910255190003321 005 20200705120629.0 010 $a981-10-0406-4 024 7 $a10.1007/978-981-10-0406-3 035 $a(CKB)3710000000686212 035 $a(EBL)4530198 035 $a(DE-He213)978-981-10-0406-3 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4530198 035 $z(PPN)25886673X 035 $a(PPN)228317614 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000686212 100 $a20160519d2016 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aInnovation and IPRs in China and India $eMyths, Realities and Opportunities /$fedited by Kung-Chung Liu, Uday S. Racherla 205 $a1st ed. 2016. 210 1$aSingapore :$cSpringer Singapore :$cImprint: Springer,$d2016. 215 $a1 online resource (230 p.) 225 1 $aChina-EU Law Series,$x2198-2708 ;$v4 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a981-10-0405-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters. 327 $aIntroduction -- Do IPRS Promote Innovation? -- Technology and Business Innovation: Role and Value Measurement of IPRs -- Does Patent Strategy Shape the Long-Run Supply of Public Knowledge? -- Innovation, IP and India: The Dichotomy Between Facts and Fiction -- The Law and Politics of Pharmaceutical Patents in India -- IPRs in China?Market-Oriented Innovation or Policy-Induced Rent-Seeking? -- Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in China -- Patent-Information Based Study on Patenting Behavior in China. 330 $aThis book examines the two most populous nations on earth ? India and China ? in an effort to demystify the interaction between intellectual property rights (IPR) regimes, innovation and economic growth by critically looking at the economic and legal realities. In addition, it analyzes the question of how innovation can best be transformed into IPR, and how IPR can best be exploited to encourage innovation. Comparing and contrasting these two giant nations can be highly beneficial as China and India were the two fastest-growing economies in the last three decades, and together their populations make up one third of the world?s total population; as such, exploring how to sustain their growth via innovation and commercialization of IPR could have a tremendous positive impact on global well-being. While a study of these two mega countries with such diverse dimensions and magnitudes can never be truly comprehensive, this joint effort by scholars from law, business management and economics disciplines that pursues an empirical approach makes a valuable contribution. Divided into three parts, the first offers an in-depth doctrinal and empirical analysis. The second part exclusively focuses on India, while the last is dedicated to China. 410 0$aChina-EU Law Series,$x2198-2708 ;$v4 606 $aMass media 606 $aLaw 606 $aPrivate international law 606 $aConflict of laws 606 $aLaw and economics 606 $aIT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R15009 606 $aPrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law $3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R14002 606 $aLaw and Economics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/W39000 615 0$aMass media. 615 0$aLaw. 615 0$aPrivate international law. 615 0$aConflict of laws. 615 0$aLaw and economics. 615 14$aIT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property. 615 24$aPrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law . 615 24$aLaw and Economics. 676 $a346.048 702 $aLiu$b Kung-Chung$4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 702 $aRacherla$b Uday S$4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910255190003321 996 $aInnovation and IPRs in China and India$92525452 997 $aUNINA