LEADER 03686nam 22005535 450 001 9910255106803321 005 20200706064303.0 010 $a3-319-57916-9 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-57916-0 035 $a(CKB)3710000001418434 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-57916-0 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4890753 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000001418434 100 $a20170628d2017 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn|008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aImplications of Open Access Repositories Quality Criteria and Features for Teachers? TPACK Development /$fby Rita Tavares, António Moreira 205 $a1st ed. 2017. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2017. 215 $a1 online resource (XXII, 55 p. 15 illus. in color.) 225 1 $aSpringerBriefs in Education,$x2211-1921 311 $a3-319-57915-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aOpen Access Repositories and Digital Educational Resources -- Study objectives and methodology -- Prevalence of European Science Education OAR and teachers? perceptions -- Most common European Science Education OAR features and their implications -- The impact of OAR usage in teachers? TPACK development -- Results and discussion -- . 330 $aThis brief will explore how open access repositories are being developed and maintained, in order to provide, disseminate and promote the development of digital educational resources. The main objective is to analyse open access repositories quality criteria and features, and how these can improve teachers? Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) development. It is organized in six major sections. Section one addresses an historical overview of open access repositories. In section two the authors present the objectives and the methodology used in the present study. Sections three, four and five analyse namely (i) the prevalence of European Science Education open access repositories and teachers? perceptions of those same repositories, (ii) the most common European Science Education open access repositories features and their implications, and (iii) the impact of open access repositories usage on teachers? TPACK development. The last section focuses on the analyses of a selected open access repository [House of Sciences (originally Casa Das Ciências)], addressing its characteristics and features, the impact of social media features in digital educational resources (re)use, and the relationship between repository quality criteria and teachers? TPACK development. . 410 0$aSpringerBriefs in Education,$x2211-1921 606 $aEducational technology 606 $aLearning 606 $aInstruction 606 $aEducational Technology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/O21000 606 $aLearning & Instruction$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/O22000 615 0$aEducational technology. 615 0$aLearning. 615 0$aInstruction. 615 14$aEducational Technology. 615 24$aLearning & Instruction. 676 $a371.33 700 $aTavares$b Rita$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01062521 702 $aMoreira$b António$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910255106803321 996 $aImplications of Open Access Repositories Quality Criteria and Features for Teachers? TPACK Development$92526353 997 $aUNINA