LEADER 03792nam  22006135  450 
001 9910255076603321
005 20200705131921.0
010   $a3-319-68578-3
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-68578-6
035   $a(CKB)4100000000882676
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-68578-6
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5110781
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000000882676
100   $a20171020d2017      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurnn|008mamaa
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aArt after the Hipster $eIdentity Politics, Ethics and Aesthetics /$fby Wes Hill
205   $a1st ed. 2017.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2017.
215   $a1 online resource (VIII, 150 p. 1 illus. in color.) 
225 1 $aPalgrave Pivot
311   $a3-319-68577-5 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
330   $a?The hipster has become a crucial theoretical figure in the early 21st century. Wes Hill shows us why and points to the long genealogy behind the concept. The philosophical origins of the hipster might even go back to that most unhip philosopher, Immanuel Kant. One of the questions Hill leaves us with is whether the hipster?s days are numbered, whether when we?re all hip anybody is.? ?Rex Butler, Professor of Art History, Monash University Evoking a level of animosity from a bygone cultural moment, the hipster belongs to a time when the economic advantages of cultural innovation in the arts were seriously believed. What that time was, and where we are now, is this book?s subject, examined through the lens of art history and the creativity hype of neoliberalism. Marking a transition from a period in Western art when irony and high-minded nonchalance reigned, the hipster appears in the context of contemporary art not as a critical standpoint in itself but as the continually deferred subject position of creative practice. Today, given the increasing impotence of the term ?hipster,? proclamations of cultural discernment are overshadowed by ethical considerations of identity, making palpable an uncertainty about our capacity to untangle capitalism?s thirst for reinvention from the artist?s thirst for subverting norms. Wes Hill lectures in Art History and Visual Culture at Southern Cross University, Australia. Previous publications include Emily Floyd: The Dawn (2014) and How Folklore Shaped Modern Art (2016).
410  0$aPalgrave pivot.
606   $aCulture?Study and teaching
606   $aFine arts
606   $aCulture
606   $aPopular Culture
606   $aDigital media
606   $aCultural Theory$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/411130
606   $aFine Arts$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/416010
606   $aGlobal/International Culture$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/411160
606   $aPopular Culture $3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/411170
606   $aDigital/New Media$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/412040
615  0$aCulture?Study and teaching.
615  0$aFine arts.
615  0$aCulture.
615  0$aPopular Culture.
615  0$aDigital media.
615 14$aCultural Theory.
615 24$aFine Arts.
615 24$aGlobal/International Culture.
615 24$aPopular Culture .
615 24$aDigital/New Media.
676   $a306.01
700   $aHill$b Wes$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0887210
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910255076603321
996   $aArt after the Hipster$91982014
997   $aUNINA