LEADER 03445nam  22006375  450 
001 9910254893203321
005 20240628133146.0
010   $a9783319408088$b(electronic bk.)
010   $a3319408089
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-40808-8
035   $a(CKB)3710000000897434
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-40808-8
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4713782
035   $a(Perlego)3494973
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000897434
100   $a20161006d2016      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurnn#008mamaa
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aSuspicions of Markets $eCritical Attacks from Aristotle to the Twenty-First Century /$fby Donald Rutherford
205   $a1st ed. 2016.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2016.
215   $a1 online resource (vi, 194 pages)
311 08$a9783319408071 
311 08$a3319408070 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aChapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: The case for markets -- Chapter 3: The start of the criticism: Aristotle -- Chapter 4: After the Greeks -- Chapter 5: Nineteenth century critics of the market -- Chapter 6: Later critics-. Chapter 7: An analysis of the principal criticisms -- Chapter 8: How to cope with flawed markets.
330   $aIn this work, Rutherford reviews why Adam Smith, Hayek, Mises and others praised economic markets, with a view to understanding, in contrast, historical attacks on markets dating as far back as Aristotle. The market has long been criticized as an inappropriate method of allocation, encouraging market participants to misbehave for the sake of personal gain, and creating an impersonal new market culture. This book traces how such attacks have become more vociferous in recent centuries, especially with the rise of socialism. Most recently the critique has broadened to include toxic markets and the excessive marketization of activities hitherto external to the market. Analysing these major criticisms, as well as the value of regulation, utopias and virtue ethics as a means of avoiding future suspicions of markets, the author lays the groundwork for the reader's own assessment of the arguments, and concludes by posing suggestions of how best we might cope with flawed markets in the future.
606   $aEconomics$xHistory
606   $aEconomic history
606   $aMacroeconomics
606   $aHistory$xPhilosophy
606   $aPhilosophy and social sciences
606   $aHistory of Economic Thought and Methodology
606   $aEconomic History
606   $aMacroeconomics and Monetary Economics
606   $aPhilosophy of History
606   $aPhilosophy of the Social Sciences
615  0$aEconomics$xHistory.
615  0$aEconomic history.
615  0$aMacroeconomics.
615  0$aHistory$xPhilosophy.
615  0$aPhilosophy and social sciences.
615 14$aHistory of Economic Thought and Methodology.
615 24$aEconomic History.
615 24$aMacroeconomics and Monetary Economics.
615 24$aPhilosophy of History.
615 24$aPhilosophy of the Social Sciences.
676   $a330.1509
700   $aRutherford$b Donald$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$061775
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910254893203321
996   $aSuspicions of Markets$92242543
997   $aUNINA