LEADER 03705nam  22005175  450 
001 9910254270103321
005 20200706164435.0
010   $a3-319-31418-1
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-31418-1
035   $a(CKB)3710000000765376
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-31418-1
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4602934
035   $a(PPN)194516636
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000765376
100   $a20160719d2016      u|             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurnn|008mamaa
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aAtlas of Full Breast Ultrasonography$b[electronic resource] /$fby Aristida Colan-Georges
205   $a1st ed. 2016.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2016.
215   $a1 online resource (XXVIII, 370 p. 318 illus., 307 illus. in color.) 
311   $a3-319-31417-3 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index.
327   $aActual Possibilities and Limits of Modern Imaging Diagnosis in Breast Cancer -- Breast Doppler Ductal Ultrasonography: Definition, History, Advantages -- Breast Doppler Ductal Echography - Technique of Examination Related to the Breast Lobar Anatomy -- Breast Development - Aspects of Doppler Ductal Ultrasonography of the Normal Breast -- Sonoelastography in Addition to Doppler Ductal Echography: Full Breast Ultrasonography -- Full Breast Ultrasonography and the Ultrasound Bi-Rads Assessment -- Full Breast Ultrasonography of the Benign Lesions -- Breast Calcifiations in Full Breast Ultrasonography -- Full Breast Ultrasonography of the Malignant Lesions .
330   $aThis atlas describes and illustrates a novel approach, referred to as full breast ultrasonography (FBU), that represents a challenge to conventional breast imaging diagnosis. The coverage encompasses examination technique, diagnostic criteria, the imaging features of a wide variety of lesions, and role in follow-up. FBU involves anatomic ultrasound scanning based on the ductal echography technique proposed by Michel Teboul, supplemented by Doppler and real-time sonoelastography. The approach offers a variety of advantages. Compared with MRI it has a lower cost, wider availability, better resolution, and improved correlation with anatomy. Compared with mammography it has the benefits of absence of irradiation and pain, applicability in all cases, and better overall accuracy. Furthermore, the standardized technique of acquisition and interpretation means that it is suitable as a screening test, unlike classic ultrasonography. FBU is applicable in ultrasound BI-RADS assessment and is of value in depicting both benign and malignant conditions. It can be recommended as a first-line method of diagnosis and for the follow-up of treated breasts, regardless of the patient?s age, sex, or physical condition. .
606   $aRadiology
606   $aOncology  
606   $aGynecology 
606   $aUltrasound$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/H29064
606   $aOncology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/H33160
606   $aGynecology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/H26006
615  0$aRadiology.
615  0$aOncology  .
615  0$aGynecology .
615 14$aUltrasound.
615 24$aOncology.
615 24$aGynecology.
676   $a616.07543
700   $aColan-Georges$b Aristida$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01061268
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910254270103321
996   $aAtlas of Full Breast Ultrasonography$92518126
997   $aUNINA