LEADER 03627 am  22006973u 450 
001 9910227351403321
005 20200325181401.0
010   $a1-78374-286-0
010   $a979-1-03-650965-0
010   $a1-78374-285-2
035   $a(CKB)4100000000883826
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5216068
035   $a(WaSeSS)IndRDA00120530
035   $a(FrMaCLE)OB-obp-4597
035   $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/29614
035   $a(PPN)230000355
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000000883826
100   $a20200603d2017      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aBasic knowledge and conditions on knowledge /$fMark McBride
210   $cOpen Book Publishers$d2017
210  1$aCambridge, England :$cOpen Book Publishers,$d2017.
215   $a1 online resource (240 pages)
311   $a1-78374-284-4 
311   $a1-78374-283-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aPart one. Exploring basic knowledge -- Reflections on Moore's 'proof' -- First reflections on the problem of easy knowledge -- The problem of easy knowledge: towards a solution -- Evidence and transmission failure -- A puzzle for dogmatism -- Part two. Conditions on knowledge: conclusive reasons, sensitivity, and safety -- Conclusive reasons -- Sensitivity -- Safety -- Safety: an application.
330   $aMcBride's book considers a variety of puzzles concerning immediate justification and knowledge. These puzzles are of active interest in the field, and it is useful to address them all in a single volume. I learned from this book, even when it covered issues I already knew well.  ?Prof. Christopher Tucker, William & Mary University  How do we know what we know? In this stimulating and rigorous book, Mark McBride explores two sets of issues in contemporary epistemology: the problems that warrant transmission poses for the category of basic knowledge; and the status of conclusive reasons, sensitivity, and safety as conditions that are necessary for knowledge.  To have basic knowledge is to know (have justification for) some proposition immediately, i.e., knowledge (justification) that doesn't depend on justification for any other proposition. This book considers several puzzles that arise when you take seriously the possibility that we can have basic knowledge.  McBride's analysis draws together two vital strands in contemporary epistemology that are usually treated in isolation from each other. Additionally, its innovative arguments include a new application of the safety condition to the law.
606   $aJustification (Theory of knowledge)
606   $aKnowledge, Theory of
606   $aCognitive science New
610   $ajustifications
610   $asafety condition
610   $asensitivity
610   $abasic knowledge
610   $aepistemology
610   $aconclusive reasons
610   $aBrain in a vat
610   $aCoherentism
610   $aDogma
610   $aFallibilism
610   $aFoundationalism
610   $aFred Dretske
610   $aInference
610   $aLogical consequence
610   $aRobert Nozick
615  0$aJustification (Theory of knowledge)
615  0$aKnowledge, Theory of.
615  0$aCognitive science New.
676   $a121
700   $aMcBride$b Mark$0927181
801  0$bWaSeSS
801  1$bWaSeSS
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910227351403321
996   $aBasic knowledge and conditions on knowledge$92083234
997   $aUNINA